Usage Score
20.8
Player Dossier
2017-2019Notre Dame
Cole Kmet
TE • 6'5" • 250 lbs • Lake Barrington, IL, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Cole Kmet reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
78.2
Consistency
61.4
Season Value
65.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason · Notre Dame
171718181919
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Notre Dame
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Georgia
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Cole Kmet, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason · Notre Dame. Cole Kmet reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason
Notre Dame paired 515 primary output with 78.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 78.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Georgia
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2019 Postseason · Notre Dame
Games
10
Receiving Yards / G
51.5
Efficiency
78.2
Usage
20.8
Consistency
61.4
Best Game by takeover score
Iowa State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Iowa State: 33. Georgia: 108. Virginia: 65. Bowling Green: 31. USC: 61. Michigan: 25. Virginia Tech: 28. Duke: 9. Boston College: 78. Stanford: 77
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Iowa State: 2 by 100. Georgia: 9 by 80. Virginia: 4 by 100. Bowling Green: 2 by 100. USC: 6 by 67.8. Michigan: 2 by 83.3. Virginia Tech: 4 by 46.7. Duke: 2 by 30. Boston College: 7 by 74.3. Stanford: 5 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins47.8 · n=8 · -18.8 vs Losses
Losses66.5 · n=2 · +18.8 vs Wins
First Half59.6 · n=5 · +16.2 vs Second Half
Second Half43.4 · n=5 · -16.2 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Georgia
Best efficiency game
100 vs Iowa State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/28 | @ Iowa State | W 33-9 | — | 2 | 33 | 16.5 | 16.50 | 0 | 23 |
| Sat 11/30 | @ Stanford | W 45-24 | — | 5 | 77 | 15.4 | 15.40 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 11/23 | vs Boston College | W 40-7 | — | 7 | 78 | 11.1 | 11.10 | 1 | 26 |
| Sun 11/10 | @ Duke | W 38-7 | — | 2 | 9 | 4.5 | 4.50 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 11/2 | vs Virginia Tech | W 21-20 | — | 4 | 28 | 7 | 7 | 1 | 10 |
| Sat 10/26 | @ Michigan | L 14-45 | — | 2 | 25 | 12.5 | 12.50 | 1 | 18 |
| Sat 10/12 | vs USC | W 30-27 | — | 6 | 61 | 10.2 | 10.20 | 1 | 14 |
| Sat 10/5 | vs Bowling Green | W 52-0 | — | 2 | 31 | 15.5 | 15.50 | 1 | 21 |
| Sat 9/28 | vs Virginia | W 35-20 | — | 4 | 65 | 16.3 | 16.30 | 0 | 37 |
| Sun 9/22 | @ Georgia100 receiving yards · High volume | L 17-23 | — | 9 | 108 | 12 | 12 | 1 | 31 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Notre Dame
2017-2019
Opening stop
Season Progression
201720172018201820192019
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 Postseason | Notre Dame | 14 | 46.7 | 8.7 | — |
| 2017 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 14 | 46.7 | 8.7 | 0 |
| 2018 Postseason | Notre Dame | 162 | 68.7 | 7.6 | 148 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 162 | 68.7 | 7.6 | 0 |
| 2019 Postseason | Notre Dame | 515 | 78.2 | 20.8 | 353 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 515 | 78.2 | 20.8 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Georgia
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
108
Primary metric
108 receiving yards with a 80 efficiency score.
#2
Northwestern
41
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
41 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Stanford
77
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
77 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Virginia
65
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
65 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Boston College
78
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
78 receiving yards with a 74.3 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2019 Postseason · Notre Dame
515 primary output · 78.2 efficiency · 20.8 usage
65.1
#2
2019 Regular Season · Notre Dame
65.1
515 primary · 78.2 efficiency · 20.8 usage
#3
2018 Postseason · Notre Dame
44.2
162 primary · 68.7 efficiency · 7.6 usage
Milestones
1
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2017 · Rating 0.9609
St. Viator · Arlington Heights, IL
- Committed To
- Notre Dame
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2017
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
691
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 23 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.