Usage Score
14.1
Player Dossier
2017-2020Army
Jon Rhattigan
LB • 6'1" • 245 lbs • Naperville, IL, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Jon Rhattigan shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 42.7 disruption score.
Efficiency
42.7
Consistency
44.2
Season Value
29.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season · Army
17181920
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- Army
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: UL Monroe
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jon Rhattigan, LB. Best season Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season · Army. Jon Rhattigan shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 42.7 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season
Army paired 0 primary output with 6.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2020 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 42.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2020 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UL Monroe
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2020 Regular Season · Army
Games
11
Havoc Plays / G
1.3
Efficiency
42.7
Usage
14.1
Consistency
44.2
Best Game by takeover score
Air Force
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Middle Tennessee: 1.5. UL Monroe: 4. Cincinnati: 2. Unknown: 1. Unknown: 1. UTSA: 1. Unknown: 1. Tulane: 2. Georgia Southern: 0. Navy: 1. Air Force: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Middle Tennessee: 6 by 40. UL Monroe: 6 by 65. Cincinnati: 8 by 53.3. Unknown: 8 by 43.3. Unknown: 8 by 43.3. UTSA: 11 by 55.8. Unknown: 7 by 39.2. Tulane: 6 by 45. Georgia Southern: 7 by 29.2. Navy: 4 by 26.7. Air Force: 7 by 29.2
Split Comparison
Wins1.3 · n=6 · -0.8 vs Losses
Losses2 · n=2 · +0.8 vs Wins
First Half1.8 · n=6 · +0.9 vs Second Half
Second Half0.8 · n=5 · -0.9 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
UL Monroe
Best efficiency game
65 vs UL Monroe
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/19 | vs Air Force | W 10-7 | 7 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 12/12 | vs Navy | W 15-0 | 4 | 3 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/21 | vs Georgia Southern | W 28-27 | 7 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/14 | @ TulaneSplash game | L 12-38 | 6 | 4 | — | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/24 | vs Unknown | — | 7 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/17 | @ UTSA10+ tackles | W 28-16 | 11 | 5 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/10 | vs Unknown | — | 8 | 4 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/3 | vs Unknown | — | 8 | 5 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/26 | @ Cincinnati | L 10-24 | 8 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Sat 9/12 | vs UL MonroeSplash game | W 37-7 | 6 | 2 | — | 2.50 | 1.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/5 | vs Middle Tennessee | W 42-0 | 6 | 0 | — | 0.50 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Army
2017-2020
Opening stop
Season Progression
2017201820192020
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 Regular Season | Army | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2018 Regular Season | Army | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Army | 0 | 6.3 | 1.7 | 0 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Army | 14.5 | 42.7 | 14.1 | 14.5 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
UL Monroe
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4
Primary metric
4 disruption/tackle impact with 66.2 takeover score.
#2
Tulane
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 36.8 takeover score.
#3
Cincinnati
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 36.4 takeover score.
#4
UTSA
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 34.1 takeover score.
#5
Middle Tennessee
1.5
Primary metric
Win with 1.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1.5 disruption/tackle impact with 31.2 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2019 Regular Season · Army
0 primary output · 6.3 efficiency · 1.7 usage
36
#2
2020 Regular Season · Army
29.7
14.5 primary · 42.7 efficiency · 14.1 usage
#3
2017 Regular Season · Army
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
Milestones
1
Impact games
2
Splash games
1
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2017 · Rating 0.7667
Neuqua Valley · Naperville, IL
- Committed To
- Army
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2017
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
84
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 15 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.