Player Stats

Rashaad Harding College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
212
TFL
20
Sacks
7.5
QB hurries
4
Passes defended
4

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2017 Regular SeasonUL Monroe7293121047.6
2018 Regular SeasonUL Monroe10431.51.51-026.1
2019 Regular SeasonUL Monroe12607.52-2054.8
2021 PostseasonLiberty138-0--053
2021 Regular SeasonLiberty13728311053

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season

UL Monroe paired 11.5 primary output with 30.4 efficiency.

Supporting note

2021 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 32.8 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2021 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across UL Monroe, Liberty.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: UL Monroe

Loss with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2021 Postseason · Liberty

Games

13

Havoc Plays / G

1

Efficiency

32.8

Usage

7.9

Consistency

12.8

Best Game by takeover score

UL Monroe

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Eastern Michigan: 0. Campbell: 0. Troy: 1. Old Dominion: 0.5. Syracuse: 0. UAB: 0. Middle Tennessee: 0. UL Monroe: 7. North Texas: 1.5. Massachusetts: 0. Ole Miss: 2. Louisiana: 0. Army: 1

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Eastern Michigan: 8 by 33.3. Campbell: 3 by 12.5. Troy: 2 by 18.3. Old Dominion: 5 by 25.8. Syracuse: 2 by 8.3. UAB: 1 by 4.2. Middle Tennessee: 2 by 8.3. UL Monroe: 15 by 100. North Texas: 13 by 65. Massachusetts: 2 by 8.3. Ole Miss: 6 by 45. Louisiana: 10 by 41.7. Army: 11 by 55.8

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins0.4 · Games = 8 · -1.6 vs Losses
Losses2 · Games = 5 · +1.6 vs Wins