Usage Score
6
Player Dossier
2017-2021Michigan
Drew Singleton
LB • 6'2" • 222 lbs • Union City, NJ, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Drew Singleton shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 21.5 disruption score.
Efficiency
21.5
Consistency
10.3
Season Value
11.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season · Michigan
171819202121
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Michigan • Rutgers
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Penn State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Drew Singleton, LB. Best season Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season · Michigan. Drew Singleton shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 21.5 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season
Michigan paired 0 primary output with 0 efficiency.
Supporting note
2021 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 21.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2021 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Michigan, Rutgers.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Penn State
Loss with 1.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 92.3th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2021 Postseason · Rutgers
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
0.4
Efficiency
21.5
Usage
6
Consistency
10.3
Best Game by takeover score
Wake Forest
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Wake Forest: 2. Temple: 0. Syracuse: 0. Unknown: 0. Michigan: 0. Ohio State: 0. Michigan State: 0. Northwestern: 0. Illinois: 0.5. Wisconsin: 0. Indiana: 0. Penn State: 1.5. Maryland: 1
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Wake Forest: 4 by 36.7. Temple: 3 by 12.5. Syracuse: 1 by 4.2. Unknown: 2 by 8.3. Michigan: 5 by 20.8. Ohio State: 1 by 4.2. Michigan State: 1 by 4.2. Northwestern: 3 by 12.5. Illinois: 3 by 17.5. Wisconsin: 4 by 16.7. Indiana: 10 by 41.7. Penn State: 12 by 65. Maryland: 6 by 35
Split Comparison
Wins0.1 · n=4 · -0.4 vs Losses
Losses0.6 · n=8 · +0.4 vs Wins
First Half0.3 · n=7 · -0.2 vs Second Half
Second Half0.5 · n=6 · +0.2 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Penn State
Best efficiency game
65 vs Penn State
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/31 | vs Wake Forest | L 10-38 | 4 | 3 | — | 1.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/27 | vs Maryland | L 16-40 | 6 | 3 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/20 | @ Penn State10+ tackles | L 0-28 | 12 | 8 | — | 1.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/13 | @ Indiana10+ tackles | W 38-3 | 10 | 6 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/6 | vs Wisconsin | L 3-52 | 4 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/30 | @ Illinois | W 20-14 | 3 | 0 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/16 | @ Northwestern | L 7-21 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/9 | vs Michigan State | L 13-31 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/2 | vs Ohio State | L 13-52 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/25 | @ Michigan | L 13-20 | 5 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/18 | vs Unknown | — | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/11 | @ Syracuse | W 17-7 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/4 | vs Temple | W 61-14 | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Michigan
2017-2018
Opening stop
- 2
Rutgers
2019-2021
Final stop
Season Progression
201720182019202020212021
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 Regular Season | Michigan | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2018 Regular Season | Michigan | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Rutgers | 3.5 | 16.4 | 4.5 | 3.5 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Rutgers | 1 | 11 | 2.2 | -2.5 |
| 2021 Postseason | Rutgers | 5 | 21.5 | 6 | 4 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Rutgers | 5 | 21.5 | 6 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Penn State
Loss with 1.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1.5
Primary metric
1.5 disruption/tackle impact with 53.1 takeover score.
#2
Wake Forest
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 49.6 takeover score.
#3
Maryland
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 48.1 takeover score.
#4
Maryland
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 32.2 takeover score.
#5
Michigan
0.5
Primary metric
Loss with 0.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0.5 disruption/tackle impact with 25.6 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2018 Regular Season · Michigan
0 primary output · 0 efficiency · 0 usage
33.3
#2
2021 Postseason · Rutgers
11.9
5 primary · 21.5 efficiency · 6 usage
#3
2021 Regular Season · Rutgers
11.9
5 primary · 21.5 efficiency · 6 usage
Milestones
0
Impact games
0
Splash games
2
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2017 · Rating 0.9626
Paramus Catholic · Paramus, NJ
- Committed To
- Michigan
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2017
Career Facts
2
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
106
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 32 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.