Usage Score
8.3
Player Dossier
2017-2022Michigan
WR • 6'1" • 200 lbs • Coralville, IA, USA
Oliver Martin reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
8.3
Efficiency
79
Consistency
45.2
Season Value
57.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season · Nebraska
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Oliver Martin, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season · Nebraska. Oliver Martin reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season
Nebraska paired 195 primary output with 79 efficiency.
Supporting note
2022 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 79 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2022 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 3 team stops, with role shifts visible across Michigan, Iowa, Nebraska.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Indiana
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
7
Receiving Yards / G
27.9
Efficiency
79
Usage
8.3
Consistency
45.2
Best Game by takeover score
Iowa
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Georgia Southern: 36. Oklahoma: 18. Indiana: 65. Rutgers: 16. Purdue: 45. Wisconsin: 8. Iowa: 7
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Georgia Southern: 2 by 100. Oklahoma: 1 by 100. Indiana: 3 by 100. Rutgers: 2 by 53.3. Purdue: 1 by 100. Wisconsin: 1 by 53.3. Iowa: 1 by 46.7
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
7 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Indiana
Best efficiency game
100 vs Purdue
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Michigan
2017-2018
Opening stop
Iowa
2019
Peak year stop
Nebraska
2020-2022
Final stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 Regular Season | Michigan | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2018 Regular Season | Michigan | 125 | 72.7 | 8.7 | 125 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Iowa | 28 | 35.6 | 8.3 | -97 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Nebraska | 63 | 68.4 | 6.6 | 35 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Nebraska | 170 | 83.3 | 15.6 | 107 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Nebraska | 195 | 79 | 8.3 | 25 |
#1 Featured game
Illinois
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
103
Primary metric
103 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Indiana
65
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
65 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Illinois
30
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
30 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Rutgers
38
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
38 receiving yards with a 84.4 efficiency score.
#5
Minnesota
22
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
22 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2022 Regular Season · Nebraska
195 primary output · 79 efficiency · 8.3 usage
57.8
#2
2021 Regular Season · Nebraska
54.5
170 primary · 83.3 efficiency · 15.6 usage
#3
2018 Regular Season · Michigan
51.1
125 primary · 72.7 efficiency · 8.7 usage
1
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2017 · Rating 0.9282
Iowa City West · Iowa City, IA
Career Facts
3
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
581
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 27 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Oliver Martin quick answers
Recruiting profile
4-star recruit