Usage Score
16.8
Player Dossier
2017-2019Michigan
WR • 6'4" • 222 lbs • Birmingham, AL, USA
Nico Collins reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
16.8
Efficiency
98.2
Consistency
62.4
Season Value
69.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason · Michigan
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Nico Collins, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason · Michigan. Nico Collins reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Nico Collins played WR for Michigan. Across 3 tracked seasons, Nico Collins recorded 1,388 receiving yards, 2 tackles, and 13 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2019 with Michigan.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason
Michigan paired 729 primary output with 98.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 98.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Indiana
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
60.8
Efficiency
98.2
Usage
16.8
Consistency
62.4
Best Game by takeover score
Alabama
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Alabama: 48. Middle Tennessee: 49. Army: 32. Wisconsin: 66. Rutgers: 59. Iowa: 63. Penn State: 89. Notre Dame: 16. Maryland: 65. Michigan State: 45. Indiana: 165. Ohio State: 32
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Alabama: 4 by 80. Middle Tennessee: 3 by 100. Army: 2 by 100. Wisconsin: 3 by 100. Rutgers: 2 by 100. Iowa: 3 by 100. Penn State: 6 by 98.9. Notre Dame: 1 by 100. Maryland: 2 by 100. Michigan State: 3 by 100. Indiana: 6 by 100. Ohio State: 2 by 100
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Indiana
Best efficiency game
100 vs Ohio State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 1/1 | @ Alabama | L 16-35 | — | 4 | 48 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 11/30 | vs Ohio State | L 27-56 | — | 2 | 32 | 16 | 16 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 11/23 | @ Indiana100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | W 39-14 | — | 6 | 165 | 27.5 | 27.50 | 3 | 76 |
| Sat 11/16 | vs Michigan State | W 44-10 | — | 3 | 45 | 15 | 15 | 1 | 22 |
| Sat 11/2 | @ Maryland | W 38-7 | — | 2 | 65 | 32.5 | 32.50 | 0 | 51 |
| Sat 10/26 | vs Notre Dame | W 45-14 | — | 1 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 1 | 16 |
| Sat 10/19 | @ Penn State | L 21-28 | — | 6 | 89 | 14.8 | 14.80 | 0 | 30 |
| Sat 10/5 | vs Iowa | W 10-3 | — | 3 | 63 | 21 | 21 | 0 | 51 |
| Sat 9/28 | vs Rutgers | W 52-0 | — | 2 | 59 | 29.5 | 29.50 | 1 | 48 |
| Sat 9/21 | @ Wisconsin | L 14-35 | — | 3 | 66 | 22 | 22 | 0 | 32 |
| Sat 9/7 | vs Army | W 24-21 | — | 2 | 32 | 16 | 16 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 8/31 | vs Middle Tennessee | W 40-21 | — | 3 | 49 | 16.3 | 16.30 | 1 | 28 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Michigan
2017-2019
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 Postseason | Michigan | 27 | 65 | 8.6 | — |
| 2017 Regular Season | Michigan | 27 | 65 | 8.6 | 0 |
| 2018 Postseason | Michigan | 632 | 82.3 | 17.8 | 605 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Michigan | 632 | 82.3 | 17.8 | 0 |
| 2019 Postseason | Michigan | 729 | 98.2 | 16.8 | 97 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Michigan | 729 | 98.2 | 16.8 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Indiana
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
165
Primary metric
165 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Ohio State
91
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
91 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Florida
80
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
80 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Northwestern
73
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
73 receiving yards with a 81.1 efficiency score.
#5
Notre Dame
66
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
66 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2019 Postseason · Michigan
729 primary output · 98.2 efficiency · 16.8 usage
69.4
#2
2019 Regular Season · Michigan
69.4
729 primary · 98.2 efficiency · 16.8 usage
#3
2018 Postseason · Michigan
65.6
632 primary · 82.3 efficiency · 17.8 usage
1
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
3
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2017 · Rating 0.9378
Clay-Chalkville · Pinson, AL
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
1,388
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 27 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.