Usage Score
2.5
Player Dossier
2018-2022Buffalo
Isaiah King
CB • 5'10" • 187 lbs • Norfolk, VA, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Isaiah King shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 23.3 disruption score.
Efficiency
23.3
Consistency
54.2
Season Value
25.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season · Buffalo
18181920202122
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Buffalo
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Kent State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Isaiah King, CB. Best season Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season · Buffalo. Isaiah King shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 23.3 disruption score.
Isaiah King played CB for Buffalo. Across 5 tracked seasons, Isaiah King recorded 23 rushing yards, 2 receiving yards, and 79 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2018 with Buffalo.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season
Buffalo paired 0 primary output with 4.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2022 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 23.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2022 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Kent State
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2022 Regular Season · Buffalo
Games
8
Havoc Plays / G
0.9
Efficiency
23.3
Usage
2.5
Consistency
54.2
Best Game by takeover score
Akron
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Coastal Carolina: 0. Eastern Michigan: 1. Miami (OH): 0. Massachusetts: 1. Toledo: 0. Ohio: 1. Kent State: 3. Akron: 1
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Coastal Carolina: 2 by 8.3. Eastern Michigan: 1 by 14.2. Miami (OH): 1 by 4.2. Massachusetts: 4 by 26.7. Toledo: 11 by 45.8. Ohio: 1 by 14.2. Kent State: 3 by 42.5. Akron: 5 by 30.8
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins0.6 · Games = 5 · -0.7 vs Losses
Losses1.3 · Games = 3 · +0.7 vs Wins
First Half0.5 · Games = 4 · -0.8 vs Second Half
Second Half1.3 · Games = 4 · +0.8 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
8 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Kent State
Best efficiency game
45.8 vs Toledo
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/2 | vs Akron | W 23-22 | 5 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/26 | vs Kent State | L 27-30 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 3 | — | — |
| Tue 11/1 | @ Ohio | L 24-45 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/22 | vs Toledo10+ tackles | W 34-27 | 11 | 10 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/15 | @ Massachusetts | W 34-7 | 4 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/1 | vs Miami (OH) | W 24-20 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/24 | @ Eastern Michigan | W 50-31 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/17 | @ Coastal Carolina | L 26-38 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Buffalo
2018-2022
Opening stop
Season Progression
2018201820192020202020212022
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 Postseason | Buffalo | 0 | 2.6 | 0.5 | — |
| 2018 Regular Season | Buffalo | 0 | 2.6 | 0.5 | 0 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Buffalo | 0 | 4.2 | 0.8 | 0 |
| 2020 Postseason | Buffalo | 1.5 | 15.2 | 2.8 | 1.5 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Buffalo | 1.5 | 15.2 | 2.8 | 0 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Buffalo | 2.5 | 12 | 2.2 | 1 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Buffalo | 7 | 23.3 | 2.5 | 4.5 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Kent State
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3
Primary metric
3 disruption/tackle impact with 48.2 takeover score.
#2
Miami (OH)
1.5
Primary metric
Loss with 1.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1.5 disruption/tackle impact with 48.1 takeover score.
#3
Kent State
1.5
Primary metric
Win with 1.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1.5 disruption/tackle impact with 44.5 takeover score.
#4
Kent State
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 30.4 takeover score.
#5
Akron
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 22.5 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2019 Regular Season · Buffalo
0 primary output · 4.2 efficiency · 0.8 usage
35
#2
2018 Postseason · Buffalo
34.4
0 primary · 2.6 efficiency · 0.5 usage
#3
2018 Regular Season · Buffalo
34.4
0 primary · 2.6 efficiency · 0.5 usage
Milestones
0
Impact games
0
Splash games
1
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2017 · Rating 0.7644
Norview · Norfolk, VA
- Committed To
- Buffalo
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2017
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
79
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 36 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.