Player Stats

Keenan Ellis College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
19
Passes defended
3

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2017 Regular SeasonBYU00-0--0-
2018 PostseasonBYU41-0--038.8
2018 Regular SeasonBYU45-0--038.8
2019 Regular SeasonBYU00-0--0-
2020 PostseasonBYU62-0--044.3
2020 Regular SeasonBYU611-0-3044.3
2021 Regular SeasonBYU00-0--0-

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2020 Postseason

BYU paired 3 primary output with 14 efficiency.

Supporting note

2020 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 14 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value cooled off

2021 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Houston

Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2020 Postseason · BYU

Games

6

Havoc Plays / G

0.5

Efficiency

14

Usage

1.6

Consistency

50

Best Game by takeover score

Houston

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. UCF: 0. UTSA: 0. Houston: 1. Texas State: 1. Western Kentucky: 1. Boise State: 0

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. UCF: 2 by 8.3. UTSA: 2 by 8.3. Houston: 4 by 26.7. Texas State: 0 by 10. Western Kentucky: 2 by 18.3. Boise State: 3 by 12.5

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

First Half0.3 · Games = 3 · -0.3 vs Second Half
Second Half0.7 · Games = 3 · +0.3 vs First Half