Player Stats

Bailey Zappe College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Total offense
5,984
Passing yards
5,967
Rushing yards
17
Touchdowns
65

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTotal OffensePass YdsRush YdsTDOverall
2021 PostseasonWestern Kentucky14417422-5672.2
2021 Regular SeasonWestern Kentucky145,5675,545225972.2

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2021 Postseason

Western Kentucky paired 5,984 primary output with 64.2 efficiency.

Supporting note

2021 Postseason role shape

pass-led usage with 64.2 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2021 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: UTSA

Loss shaped by high passing volume and turnover pressure. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2021 Postseason · Western Kentucky

Games

14

Primary Metric / G

427.4

Efficiency

64.2

Usage

15.9

Consistency

89.2

Best Game by takeover score

UTSA

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011121314

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. App State: 417. UT Martin: 448. Army: 442. Indiana: 371. Michigan State: 471. UTSA: 525. Old Dominion: 405. Florida International: 375. Charlotte: 406. Middle Tennessee: 275. Rice: 477. Florida Atlantic: 473. Marshall: 317. UTSA: 582

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. App State: 49 by 61.3. UT Martin: 37 by 92.1. Army: 48 by 64.8. Indiana: 45 by 74.9. Michigan State: 71 by 58.9. UTSA: 66 by 58.2. Old Dominion: 57 by 61.8. Florida International: 52 by 61.1. Charlotte: 48 by 67.9. Middle Tennessee: 52 by 51.2. Rice: 45 by 66.8. Florida Atlantic: 50 by 68.3. Marshall: 51 by 52.3. UTSA: 66 by 59

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins399.2 · Games = 9 · -79.0 vs Losses
Losses478.2 · Games = 5 · +79.0 vs Wins