Player Stats

Malik Stanley College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
1,083
Receptions
75
Touchdowns
7

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2015 Regular SeasonSouth Alabama0-00-
2016 Regular SeasonSouth Alabama0-00-
2017 Regular SeasonSouth Alabama827324365.4
2018 Regular SeasonSouth Alabama48110151.9
2019 PostseasonLouisiana Tech12375068.2
2019 Regular SeasonLouisiana Tech1237574368.2

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason

Louisiana Tech paired 649 primary output with 78 efficiency.

Supporting note

2019 Postseason role shape

target-driven usage with 78 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across South Alabama, Louisiana Tech.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Southern Miss

Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2019 Postseason · Louisiana Tech

Games

12

Receiving Yards / G

54.1

Efficiency

78

Usage

16.6

Consistency

39.4

Best Game by takeover score

Southern Miss

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789101112

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Miami: 75. Texas: 48. Grambling: 40. Bowling Green: 27. Florida International: 54. Massachusetts: 13. Southern Miss: 212. UTEP: 39. North Texas: 17. Marshall: 82. UAB: 2. UTSA: 40

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Miami: 3 by 100. Texas: 4 by 80. Grambling: 1 by 100. Bowling Green: 2 by 90. Florida International: 3 by 100. Massachusetts: 1 by 86.7. Southern Miss: 8 by 100. UTEP: 4 by 65. North Texas: 2 by 56.7. Marshall: 7 by 78.1. UAB: 1 by 13.3. UTSA: 4 by 66.7

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins57.4 · Games = 9 · +13.4 vs Losses
Losses44 · Games = 3 · -13.4 vs Wins