Player Stats

Noah Wilder College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
329
TFL
26
Sacks
6
QB hurries
7
Passes defended
4

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2018 Regular SeasonUAB00-0--0-
2019 PostseasonUAB13521--062.6
2019 Regular SeasonUAB13809231062.6
2020 Regular SeasonUAB9504.5211045.8
2021 PostseasonUAB137-0--039.8
2021 Regular SeasonUAB13865.50.5--039.8
2022 PostseasonUAB1210.50.5--062.4
2022 Regular SeasonUAB121004.5032062.4

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason

UAB paired 18 primary output with 40.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

2022 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 40.7 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2022 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Georgia Southern

Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2022 Postseason · UAB

Games

12

Havoc Plays / G

0.9

Efficiency

40.7

Usage

11.2

Consistency

56.9

Best Game by takeover score

Georgia Southern

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789101112

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Miami (OH): 1. Alabama A&M: 0.5. Liberty: 2. Georgia Southern: 2. Rice: 2. Middle Tennessee: 0. Charlotte: 0. Western Kentucky: 1. Florida Atlantic: 0. UTSA: 1. North Texas: 1. LSU: 0

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Miami (OH): 1 by 14.2. Alabama A&M: 9 by 42.5. Liberty: 5 by 40.8. Georgia Southern: 18 by 70. Rice: 8 by 53.3. Middle Tennessee: 3 by 12.5. Charlotte: 11 by 45.8. Western Kentucky: 14 by 60. Florida Atlantic: 7 by 29.2. UTSA: 13 by 60. North Texas: 6 by 35. LSU: 6 by 25

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins0.8 · Games = 6 · -0.3 vs Losses
Losses1 · Games = 6 · +0.3 vs Wins