Player Stats

Ronald Awatt College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
2,015
Rushing yards
1,780
Receiving yards
235
Touchdowns
11

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2016 Regular SeasonUTEP00000-
2017 Regular SeasonUTEP213130031.5
2018 Regular SeasonUTEP3000050
2019 Regular SeasonUTEP00000-
2020 Regular SeasonUTEP61901900338.7
2021 PostseasonUTEP13864046170.9
2021 Regular SeasonUTEP13916803113570.9
2022 Regular SeasonUTEP1281073476267.9

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2021 Postseason

UTEP paired 1,002 primary output with 50.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

2022 Regular Season role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 47.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2022 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: New Mexico State

Win driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2022 Regular Season · UTEP

Games

12

Scrimmage Yards / G

67.5

Efficiency

47.5

Usage

25.6

Consistency

70.1

Best Game by takeover score

New Mexico State

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789101112

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Oklahoma: 50. North Texas: 37. New Mexico State: 130. New Mexico: 35. Boise State: 61. Charlotte: 88. Louisiana Tech: 66. Florida Atlantic: 99. Middle Tennessee: 48. Rice: 33. Florida International: 84. UTSA: 79

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Oklahoma: 13 by 36.3. North Texas: 11 by 36.5. New Mexico State: 22 by 58.8. New Mexico: 8 by 45.6. Boise State: 18 by 33.2. Charlotte: 13 by 70.5. Louisiana Tech: 15 by 45.8. Florida Atlantic: 17 by 48.8. Middle Tennessee: 12 by 41.7. Rice: 9 by 38.2. Florida International: 17 by 51.5. UTSA: 13 by 63.3

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins92.4 · Games = 5 · +42.7 vs Losses
Losses49.7 · Games = 7 · -42.7 vs Wins