Usage Score
25.6
Player Dossier
2016-2022UTEP
RB • 6'0" • 213 lbs • Lubbock, TX, USA
Ronald Awatt leans balanced backfield option traits and 47.5 efficiency.
Usage Score
25.6
Efficiency
47.5
Consistency
70.1
Season Value
57.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2021 Postseason · UTEP
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Ronald Awatt, RB. Best season Best season by value score: 2021 Postseason · UTEP. Ronald Awatt leans balanced backfield option traits and 47.5 efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2021 Postseason
UTEP paired 1,002 primary output with 50.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2022 Regular Season role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 47.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2022 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: New Mexico State
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Scrimmage Yards / G
67.5
Efficiency
47.5
Usage
25.6
Consistency
70.1
Best Game by takeover score
UTSA
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Oklahoma: 50. North Texas: 37. New Mexico State: 130. New Mexico: 35. Boise State: 61. Charlotte: 88. Louisiana Tech: 66. Florida Atlantic: 99. Middle Tennessee: 48. Rice: 33. Florida International: 84. UTSA: 79
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Oklahoma: 13 by 36.3. North Texas: 11 by 36.5. New Mexico State: 22 by 58.8. New Mexico: 8 by 45.6. Boise State: 18 by 33.2. Charlotte: 13 by 70.5. Louisiana Tech: 15 by 45.8. Florida Atlantic: 17 by 48.8. Middle Tennessee: 12 by 41.7. Rice: 9 by 38.2. Florida International: 17 by 51.5. UTSA: 13 by 63.3
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
New Mexico State
Best efficiency game
70.5 vs Charlotte
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/26 | @ UTSA | L 31-34 | 13 | 79 | 6.10 | 0 | — | — | 6.1 |
| Sat 11/19 | vs Florida International | W 40-6 | 17 | 84 | 4.90 | 0 | — | — | 4.9 |
| Thu 11/3 | @ Rice | L 30-37 | 9 | 33 | 3.70 | 0 | — | — | 3.7 |
| Sun 10/30 | vs Middle Tennessee | L 13-24 | 12 | 48 | 4 | 0 | — | — | 4 |
| Sat 10/22 | vs Florida Atlantic | W 24-21 | 15 | 59 | 3.90 | 0 | 2 | 40 | 5.8 |
| Sat 10/8 | @ Louisiana Tech | L 31-41 | 15 | 66 | 4.40 | 0 | — | — | 4.4 |
| Sat 10/1 | @ Charlotte | W 41-35 | 13 | 88 | 6.80 | 0 | — | — | 6.8 |
| Sat 9/24 | vs Boise State | W 27-10 | 17 | 52 | 3.10 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 3.4 |
| Sun 9/18 | @ New Mexico | L 10-27 | 8 | 35 | 4.40 | 0 | — | — | 4.4 |
| Sun 9/11 | vs New Mexico State100 rush yards | W 20-13 | 21 | 115 | 5.50 | 1 | 1 | 15 | 5.9 |
| Sat 9/3 | @ Oklahoma | L 13-45 | 12 | 39 | 3.30 | 1 | 1 | 11 | 3.8 |
| Sun 8/28 | vs North Texas | L 13-31 | 10 | 36 | 3.60 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3.4 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
UTEP
2016-2022
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Regular Season | UTEP | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2017 Regular Season | UTEP | 13 | 29.6 | 6.9 | 13 |
| 2018 Regular Season | UTEP | 0 | — | 0 | -13 |
| 2019 Regular Season | UTEP | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2020 Regular Season | UTEP | 190 | 46.9 | 12.5 | 190 |
| 2021 Postseason | UTEP | 1,002 | 50.5 | 25.6 | 812 |
| 2021 Regular Season | UTEP | 1,002 | 50.5 | 25.6 | 0 |
| 2022 Regular Season | UTEP | 810 | 47.5 | 25.6 | -192 |
#1 Featured game
Rice
Win with 184 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
184
Primary metric
184 scrimmage yards and 20 usage.
#2
Southern Miss
159
Primary metric
Win with 159 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
159 scrimmage yards and 39.1 usage.
#3
New Mexico State
130
Primary metric
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
130 scrimmage yards and 51.2 usage.
#4
Unknown
147
Primary metric
Game with 147 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
147 scrimmage yards and 30.8 usage.
#5
North Texas
79
Primary metric
Loss with 79 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
79 scrimmage yards and 21.2 usage.
#1 Season by value score
2021 Postseason · UTEP
1,002 primary output · 50.5 efficiency · 25.6 usage
59
#2
2021 Regular Season · UTEP
59
1,002 primary · 50.5 efficiency · 25.6 usage
#3
2022 Regular Season · UTEP
57.8
810 primary · 47.5 efficiency · 25.6 usage
4
100+ rush yards
2
150+ scrimmage yards
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2016 · Rating 0.7578
Frenship · Wolfforth, TX
Career Facts
1
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
2,015
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 36 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Ronald Awatt quick answers
Recruiting profile
2-star recruit