Usage Score
6.9
Player Dossier
2018-2022UTSA
Dadrian Taylor
LB • 5'11" • 185 lbs • Shiner, TX, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Dadrian Taylor shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 22 disruption score.
Efficiency
22
Consistency
54.5
Season Value
26.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2022 Postseason · UTSA
181920212222
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- UTSA
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: UNLV
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Dadrian Taylor, LB. Best season Best season by value score: 2022 Postseason · UTSA. Dadrian Taylor shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 22 disruption score.
Dadrian Taylor played LB for UTSA. Across 5 tracked seasons, Dadrian Taylor recorded -9 rushing yards, 115 tackles, and 6 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2021 with UTSA.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2022 Postseason
UTSA paired 10 primary output with 22 efficiency.
Supporting note
2022 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 22 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2022 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: North Texas
Win with 3.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2022 Postseason · UTSA
Games
11
Havoc Plays / G
0.9
Efficiency
22
Usage
6.9
Consistency
54.5
Best Game by takeover score
Troy
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Troy: 1. Houston: 1. Army: 0. Middle Tennessee: 1. Western Kentucky: 0. Florida International: 0.5. North Texas: 3.5. UAB: 0. Louisiana Tech: 1. Rice: 1. UTEP: 1
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Troy: 4 by 26.7. Houston: 10 by 51.7. Middle Tennessee: 2 by 18.3. Western Kentucky: 2 by 8.3. Florida International: 2 by 13.3. North Texas: 3 by 47.5. UAB: 5 by 20.8. Louisiana Tech: 1 by 14.2. Rice: 2 by 18.3. UTEP: 3 by 22.5
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins0.9 · Games = 9 · -0.1 vs Losses
Losses1 · Games = 2 · +0.1 vs Wins
First Half0.6 · Games = 6 · -0.7 vs Second Half
Second Half1.3 · Games = 5 · +0.7 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
North Texas
Best efficiency game
51.7 vs Houston
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/16 | @ Troy | L 12-18 | 4 | 3 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/26 | vs UTEP | W 34-31 | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/19 | @ Rice | W 41-7 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/12 | vs Louisiana Tech | W 51-7 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/5 | @ UAB | W 44-38 | 5 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/22 | vs North Texas | W 31-27 | 3 | 1 | — | 1.50 | 1 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/15 | @ Florida International | W 30-10 | 2 | 1 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/8 | vs Western Kentucky | W 31-28 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 9/30 | @ Middle Tennessee | W 45-30 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/10 | @ Army | W 41-38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/3 | vs Houston10+ tackles | L 35-37 | 10 | 7 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
UTSA
2018-2022
Opening stop
Season Progression
201820192020202120222022
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 Regular Season | UTSA | 2 | 10 | 1.1 | — |
| 2019 Regular Season | UTSA | 1 | 9.5 | 2.8 | -1 |
| 2020 Regular Season | UTSA | 5 | 15.1 | 3.9 | 4 |
| 2021 Regular Season | UTSA | 9 | 22.4 | 6 | 4 |
| 2022 Postseason | UTSA | 10 | 22 | 6.9 | 1 |
| 2022 Regular Season | UTSA | 10 | 22 | 6.9 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
UNLV
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
4
Primary metric
4 disruption/tackle impact with 62.7 takeover score.
#2
North Texas
3.5
Primary metric
Win with 3.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3.5 disruption/tackle impact with 56.1 takeover score.
#3
Southern Miss
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 48.3 takeover score.
#4
UAB
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 47.6 takeover score.
#5
Texas A&M
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 41.7 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2022 Postseason · UTSA
10 primary output · 22 efficiency · 6.9 usage
26.3
#2
2022 Regular Season · UTSA
26.3
10 primary · 22 efficiency · 6.9 usage
#3
2021 Regular Season · UTSA
21.7
9 primary · 22.4 efficiency · 6 usage
Milestones
1
Impact games
2
Splash games
1
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2017 · Rating 0.8028
Shiner · Shiner, TX
- Committed To
- UTSA
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2017
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
115
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 43 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.