Player Stats

Armani Marsh College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
178
TFL
10.5
Sacks
2
QB hurries
3
Passes defended
12
Touchdowns
2

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2018 Regular SeasonWashington State11-0--037
2019 Regular SeasonWashington State924-0-2013.1
2020 Regular SeasonWashington State42220-1046
2021 PostseasonWashington State1290.50--074.2
2021 Regular SeasonWashington State12615024274.2
2022 Regular SeasonWashington State11613215057.5

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2021 Postseason

Washington State paired 14.5 primary output with 36.4 efficiency.

Supporting note

2022 Regular Season role shape

impact-led usage with 34 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value cooled off

2022 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Idaho

Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2022 Regular Season · Washington State

Games

11

Havoc Plays / G

1.1

Efficiency

34

Usage

7

Consistency

54.7

Best Game by takeover score

Idaho

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Idaho: 3. Wisconsin: 0. Colorado State: 0. Oregon: 1. California: 1. USC: 2. Oregon State: 2. Utah: 1. Stanford: 0. Arizona State: 0. Arizona: 2

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Idaho: 6 by 55. Wisconsin: 5 by 20.8. Colorado State: 6 by 25. Oregon: 4 by 26.7. California: 7 by 39.2. USC: 6 by 45. Oregon State: 2 by 28.3. Utah: 9 by 47.5. Stanford: 7 by 29.2. Arizona State: 2 by 8.3. Arizona: 7 by 49.2

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins0.9 · Games = 7 · -0.6 vs Losses
Losses1.5 · Games = 4 · +0.6 vs Wins