Usage Score
27.8
Player Dossier
2018-2021Washington State
Travell Harris
WR • 5'9" • 180 lbs • Tampa, FL, USA
Alpha targetPossession profile
Travell Harris reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
66.7
Consistency
55.5
Season Value
62.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2021 Postseason · Washington State
18181919202121
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Washington State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Oregon State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Travell Harris, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2021 Postseason · Washington State. Travell Harris reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2021 Postseason
Washington State paired 814 primary output with 66.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2021 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 66.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2021 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Oregon State
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2021 Postseason · Washington State
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
62.6
Efficiency
66.7
Usage
27.8
Consistency
55.5
Best Game by takeover score
Central Michigan
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Central Michigan: 13. Utah State: 23. Unknown: 80. USC: 49. Utah: 49. California: 46. Oregon State: 147. Stanford: 71. BYU: 60. Arizona State: 49. Oregon: 109. Arizona: 95. Washington: 23
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Central Michigan: 3 by 28.9. Utah State: 5 by 30.7. Unknown: 6 by 88.9. USC: 7 by 46.7. Utah: 6 by 54.4. California: 7 by 43.8. Oregon State: 8 by 100. Stanford: 5 by 94.7. BYU: 7 by 57.1. Arizona State: 3 by 100. Oregon: 8 by 90.8. Arizona: 6 by 100. Washington: 5 by 30.7
Split Comparison
Wins71.8 · n=6 · +21.3 vs Losses
Losses50.5 · n=6 · -21.3 vs Wins
First Half58.1 · n=7 · -9.7 vs Second Half
Second Half67.8 · n=6 · +9.7 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Oregon State
Best efficiency game
100 vs Arizona
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/31 | @ Central Michigan | L 21-24 | — | 3 | 13 | 4.5 | 4.30 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 11/27 | @ Washington | W 40-13 | — | 5 | 23 | 4.6 | 4.60 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 11/20 | vs Arizona2+ TD | W 44-18 | — | 6 | 95 | 15.8 | 15.80 | 2 | 32 |
| Sun 11/14 | @ Oregon100 receiving yards · High volume | L 24-38 | — | 8 | 109 | 13.6 | 13.60 | 1 | 39 |
| Sat 10/30 | @ Arizona State | W 34-21 | — | 3 | 49 | 11.5 | 16.30 | 1 | 28 |
| Sat 10/23 | vs BYU | L 19-21 | — | 7 | 60 | 8.6 | 8.60 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 10/16 | vs Stanford | W 34-31 | — | 5 | 71 | 14.2 | 14.20 | 1 | 32 |
| Sat 10/9 | vs Oregon State100 receiving yards · High volume | W 31-24 | — | 8 | 147 | 18.4 | 18.40 | 0 | 58 |
| Sat 10/2 | @ California | W 21-6 | — | 7 | 46 | 6.6 | 6.60 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 9/25 | @ Utah | L 13-24 | — | 6 | 49 | 8.2 | 8.20 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 9/18 | vs USC2+ TD | L 14-45 | — | 7 | 49 | 7 | 7 | 2 | 13 |
| Sat 9/11 | vs Unknown2+ TD | — | — | 6 | 80 | 13.3 | 13.30 | 2 | 29 |
| Sun 9/5 | vs Utah State | L 23-26 | — | 5 | 23 | 4.6 | 4.60 | 0 | 7 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Washington State
2018-2021
Opening stop
Season Progression
2018201820192019202020212021
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 Postseason | Washington State | 309 | 67.3 | 6.8 | — |
| 2018 Regular Season | Washington State | 309 | 67.3 | 6.8 | 0 |
| 2019 Postseason | Washington State | 536 | 64.9 | 9.1 | 227 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Washington State | 536 | 64.9 | 9.1 | 0 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Washington State | 340 | 78.1 | 31.5 | -196 |
| 2021 Postseason | Washington State | 814 | 66.7 | 27.8 | 474 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Washington State | 814 | 66.7 | 27.8 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Oregon State
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
107
Primary metric
107 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Oregon State
147
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
147 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Arizona
95
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
95 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
New Mexico State
91
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
91 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
San José State
83
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
83 receiving yards with a 92.2 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2021 Postseason · Washington State
814 primary output · 66.7 efficiency · 27.8 usage
62.5
#2
2021 Regular Season · Washington State
62.5
814 primary · 66.7 efficiency · 27.8 usage
#3
2020 Regular Season · Washington State
59.1
340 primary · 78.1 efficiency · 31.5 usage
Milestones
3
100+ receiving yards
3
8+ catch outings
5
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2017 · Rating 0.8007
Jesuit · Tampa, FL
- Committed To
- Washington State
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2017
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
1,999
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 43 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.