Player Stats

Cameron Montgomery College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
1,042
Rushing yards
919
Receiving yards
123
Touchdowns
2

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2017 Regular SeasonRice872720026
2018 Regular SeasonRice00000-
2019 Regular SeasonRice538308029.7
2020 Regular SeasonRice00000-
2021 Regular SeasonRice1129625640234.6
2022 PostseasonRice1363630064.4
2022 Regular SeasonRice1357349875064.4

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2022 Postseason

Rice paired 636 primary output with 58.6 efficiency.

Supporting note

2022 Postseason role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 58.6 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2022 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: USC

Loss with 99 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2022 Postseason · Rice

Games

13

Scrimmage Yards / G

48.9

Efficiency

58.6

Usage

14.6

Consistency

57.4

Best Game by takeover score

USC

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Southern Miss: 63. USC: 99. McNeese: 12. Louisiana: 32. Houston: 20. UAB: 40. Florida Atlantic: 33. Louisiana Tech: 86. Charlotte: 35. UTEP: 93. Western Kentucky: 77. UTSA: -3. North Texas: 49

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Southern Miss: 7 by 87.5. USC: 6 by 100. McNeese: 5 by 11.6. Louisiana: 5 by 66.7. Houston: 5 by 47.9. UAB: 6 by 70.3. Florida Atlantic: 4 by 84.4. Louisiana Tech: 15 by 62.7. Charlotte: 10 by 36.5. UTEP: 9 by 88.4. Western Kentucky: 13 by 59.3. UTSA: 5 by 0. North Texas: 11 by 46.4

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins52.6 · Games = 5 · +6.0 vs Losses
Losses46.6 · Games = 8 · -6.0 vs Wins