Usage Score
22.8
Player Dossier
2018-2022Eastern Michigan
Quian Williams
WR • 6'0" • 193 lbs • Oklahoma City, OK, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Quian Williams reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
74.6
Consistency
69.2
Season Value
62.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2021 Regular Season · Buffalo
18191920212222
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Eastern Michigan • Buffalo
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Old Dominion
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Quian Williams, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2021 Regular Season · Buffalo. Quian Williams reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2021 Regular Season
Buffalo paired 835 primary output with 75.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2022 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 74.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2022 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Eastern Michigan, Buffalo.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Eastern Michigan
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 83.3th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2022 Postseason · Buffalo
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
59.4
Efficiency
74.6
Usage
22.8
Consistency
69.2
Best Game by takeover score
Georgia Southern
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Georgia Southern: 100. Maryland: 28. Unknown: 105. Coastal Carolina: 62. Eastern Michigan: 99. Miami (OH): 77. Bowling Green: 33. Massachusetts: 9. Toledo: 37. Ohio: 64. Central Michigan: 36. Kent State: 63
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Georgia Southern: 5 by 100. Maryland: 3 by 62.2. Unknown: 8 by 87.5. Coastal Carolina: 8 by 51.7. Eastern Michigan: 6 by 100. Miami (OH): 7 by 73.3. Bowling Green: 1 by 100. Massachusetts: 3 by 20. Toledo: 5 by 49.3. Ohio: 6 by 71.1. Central Michigan: 3 by 80. Kent State: 4 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins59.2 · n=6 · +8.6 vs Losses
Losses50.6 · n=5 · -8.6 vs Wins
First Half78.5 · n=6 · +38.2 vs Second Half
Second Half40.3 · n=6 · -38.2 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Eastern Michigan
Best efficiency game
100 vs Georgia Southern
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue 12/27 | vs Georgia Southern100 receiving yards | W 23-21 | — | 5 | 100 | 20 | 20 | 0 | 36 |
| Sat 11/26 | vs Kent State | L 27-30 | — | 4 | 63 | 13.4 | 15.80 | 0 | 29 |
| Thu 11/10 | @ Central Michigan | L 27-31 | — | 3 | 36 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 26 |
| Tue 11/1 | @ Ohio | L 24-45 | — | 6 | 64 | 10.7 | 10.70 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 10/22 | vs Toledo | W 34-27 | — | 5 | 37 | 7.4 | 7.40 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 10/15 | @ Massachusetts | W 34-7 | — | 3 | 9 | 1.8 | 3 | 1 | 4 |
| Sat 10/8 | @ Bowling Green | W 38-7 | — | 1 | 33 | 33 | 33 | 0 | 33 |
| Sat 10/1 | vs Miami (OH) | W 24-20 | — | 7 | 77 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 9/24 | @ Eastern Michigan | W 50-31 | — | 6 | 99 | 16.5 | 16.50 | 1 | 59 |
| Sat 9/17 | @ Coastal CarolinaHigh volume | L 26-38 | — | 8 | 62 | 7.8 | 7.80 | 1 | 14 |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Unknown100 receiving yards · High volume | — | — | 8 | 105 | 13.1 | 13.10 | 1 | 59 |
| Sat 9/3 | @ Maryland | L 10-31 | — | 3 | 28 | 9.3 | 9.30 | 0 | 10 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Eastern Michigan
2018-2020
Opening stop
- 2
Buffalo
2021-2022
Final stop
Season Progression
2018201920192020202120222022
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 Regular Season | Eastern Michigan | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2019 Postseason | Eastern Michigan | 661 | 80.5 | 18.3 | 661 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Eastern Michigan | 661 | 80.5 | 18.3 | 0 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Eastern Michigan | 372 | 82.2 | 21.9 | -289 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Buffalo | 835 | 75.7 | 29.7 | 463 |
| 2022 Postseason | Buffalo | 713 | 74.6 | 22.8 | -122 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Buffalo | 713 | 74.6 | 22.8 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Old Dominion
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
134
Primary metric
134 receiving yards with a 99.3 efficiency score.
#2
Western Michigan
119
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
119 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Unknown
115
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
115 receiving yards with a 95.8 efficiency score.
#4
Eastern Michigan
99
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
99 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Unknown
105
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
105 receiving yards with a 87.5 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2021 Regular Season · Buffalo
835 primary output · 75.7 efficiency · 29.7 usage
67.8
#2
2022 Postseason · Buffalo
62.9
713 primary · 74.6 efficiency · 22.8 usage
#3
2022 Regular Season · Buffalo
62.9
713 primary · 74.6 efficiency · 22.8 usage
Milestones
7
100+ receiving yards
9
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2017 · Rating 0.7611
Southmoore · Moore, OK
- Committed To
- Eastern Michigan
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2017
Career Facts
2
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
2,581
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 42 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.