Usage Score
11.8
Player Dossier
2018-2022Central Michigan
Darius Bracy
RB • 5'10" • 214 lbs • Mobile, AL, USA
Balanced backfield optionSteady chain mover
Darius Bracy leans balanced backfield option traits and 36.6 efficiency.
Efficiency
36.6
Consistency
26.5
Season Value
43.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season · Central Michigan
18192021212222
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Central Michigan • Middle Tennessee
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Missouri
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Darius Bracy, RB. Best season Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season · Central Michigan. Darius Bracy leans balanced backfield option traits and 36.6 efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season
Central Michigan paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2022 Postseason role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 36.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2022 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Central Michigan, Middle Tennessee.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UTSA
Loss with 79 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 90.9th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2022 Postseason · Middle Tennessee
Games
11
Scrimmage Yards / G
32.4
Efficiency
36.6
Usage
11.8
Consistency
26.5
Best Game by takeover score
San Diego State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. San Diego State: 10. James Madison: 8. Colorado State: -7. Unknown: 23. Miami: 11. UTSA: 79. UAB: 40. UTEP: 14. Charlotte: 0. Florida Atlantic: 74. Florida International: 104
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. San Diego State: 3 by 35.8. James Madison: 5 by 28.5. Colorado State: 7 by 0. Unknown: 4 by 49. Miami: 7 by 11.8. UTSA: 8 by 91.1. UAB: 10 by 39.6. UTEP: 5 by 30.4. Charlotte: 1 by 0. Florida Atlantic: 9 by 68.2. Florida International: 22 by 48.1
Split Comparison
Wins29.4 · n=7 · -12.9 vs Losses
Losses42.3 · n=3 · +12.9 vs Wins
First Half20.7 · n=6 · -25.7 vs Second Half
Second Half46.4 · n=5 · +25.7 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
UTSA
Best efficiency game
91.1 vs UTSA
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 12/25 | @ San Diego State | W 25-23 | 2 | 7 | 3.50 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3.3 |
| Sat 11/26 | @ Florida International | W 33-28 | 20 | 91 | 4.60 | 1 | 2 | 13 | 4.7 |
| Sat 11/19 | vs Florida Atlantic2+ TD | W 49-21 | 7 | 38 | 5.40 | 1 | 2 | 36 | 8.2 |
| Sat 11/12 | vs Charlotte | W 24-14 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| Sun 10/30 | @ UTEP | W 24-13 | 4 | 12 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2.8 |
| Sat 10/8 | @ UAB | L 14-41 | 9 | 33 | 3.70 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 4 |
| Fri 9/30 | vs UTSA | L 30-45 | 3 | 53 | 17.70 | 1 | 5 | 26 | 9.9 |
| Sat 9/24 | @ Miami | W 45-31 | 6 | 5 | 0.80 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 1.6 |
| Sat 9/17 | vs Unknown | — | 3 | 12 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 11 | 5.8 |
| Sat 9/10 | @ Colorado State | W 34-19 | 6 | -1 | -0.20 | 0 | 1 | -6 | -1 |
| Sat 9/3 | @ James Madison | L 7-44 | 4 | 14 | 3.50 | 0 | 1 | -6 | 1.6 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Central Michigan
2018-2021
Opening stop
- 2
Middle Tennessee
2022
Final stop
Season Progression
2018201920202021202120222022
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 Regular Season | Central Michigan | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| 2019 Regular Season | Central Michigan | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Central Michigan | 50 | 39.6 | 5.1 | 50 |
| 2021 Postseason | Central Michigan | 249 | 48.4 | 7.6 | 199 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Central Michigan | 249 | 48.4 | 7.6 | 0 |
| 2022 Postseason | Middle Tennessee | 356 | 36.6 | 11.8 | 107 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Middle Tennessee | 356 | 36.6 | 11.8 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Missouri
Loss with 91 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
91
Primary metric
91 scrimmage yards and 6.3 usage.
#2
Ohio
28
Primary metric
Win with 28 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
28 scrimmage yards and 4.3 usage.
#3
UTSA
79
Primary metric
Loss with 79 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
79 scrimmage yards and 15.1 usage.
#4
Florida International
104
Primary metric
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
104 scrimmage yards and 31.4 usage.
#5
Florida Atlantic
74
Primary metric
Win with 74 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
74 scrimmage yards and 11.8 usage.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2018 Regular Season · Central Michigan
0 primary output · — efficiency · 0 usage
50
#2
2019 Regular Season · Central Michigan
50
0 primary · — efficiency · 0 usage
#3
2022 Postseason · Middle Tennessee
43.7
356 primary · 36.6 efficiency · 11.8 usage
Milestones
1
100+ rush yards
0
150+ scrimmage yards
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2017 · Rating 0.7726
Baker · Mobile, AL
- Committed To
- Central Michigan
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2017
Career Facts
2
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
655
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 36 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.