Player Stats

Antonio Phillips College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
137
TFL
2
Sacks
1
QB hurries
1
Passes defended
18
Touchdowns
2

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2017 Regular SeasonBall State7191.51-4045
2018 Regular SeasonBall State10430.50-5056.5
2019 Regular SeasonBall State1043-0-3054.3
2020 PostseasonBall State82-0-1259.6
2020 Regular SeasonBall State830-015059.6

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2020 Postseason

Ball State paired 9 primary output with 27.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

2020 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 27.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2020 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Eastern Michigan

Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2020 Postseason · Ball State

Games

8

Havoc Plays / G

1.1

Efficiency

27.9

Usage

6

Consistency

60.5

Best Game by takeover score

Eastern Michigan

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. San José State: 2. Miami (OH): 1. Eastern Michigan: 3. Northern Illinois: 1. Toledo: 1. Central Michigan: 0. Western Michigan: 0. Buffalo: 1

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. San José State: 2 by 28.3. Miami (OH): 5 by 30.8. Eastern Michigan: 4 by 46.7. Northern Illinois: 4 by 26.7. Toledo: 6 by 35. Central Michigan: 1 by 4.2. Western Michigan: 4 by 16.7. Buffalo: 6 by 35

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins1.1 · Games = 7 · +0.1 vs Losses
Losses1 · Games = 1 · -0.1 vs Wins