Player Stats

Brett Anderson II College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
226
TFL
5.5
Passes defended
7

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2017 Regular SeasonBall State92910-2026.7
2018 Regular SeasonBall State116210-1023.9
2019 Regular SeasonBall State7200.50-1016.5
2020 PostseasonBall State8410--061.8
2020 Regular SeasonBall State84310-2061.8
2021 PostseasonBall State128-0--025.5
2021 Regular SeasonBall State126010-1025.5

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2020 Postseason

Ball State paired 6 primary output with 32 efficiency.

Supporting note

2021 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 25.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2021 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Penn State

Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2021 Postseason · Ball State

Games

12

Havoc Plays / G

0.2

Efficiency

25.3

Usage

4.5

Consistency

5.6

Best Game by takeover score

Penn State

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789101112

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Georgia State: 0. Western Illinois: 0. Penn State: 1. Wyoming: 0. Toledo: 0. Army: 0. Western Michigan: 1. Eastern Michigan: 0. Miami (OH): 0. Akron: 0. Northern Illinois: 0. Central Michigan: 0

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Georgia State: 8 by 33.3. Western Illinois: 4 by 16.7. Penn State: 10 by 51.7. Wyoming: 7 by 29.2. Toledo: 3 by 12.5. Army: 1 by 4.2. Western Michigan: 2 by 18.3. Eastern Michigan: 7 by 29.2. Miami (OH): 5 by 20.8. Akron: 7 by 29.2. Northern Illinois: 7 by 29.2. Central Michigan: 7 by 29.2

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins0.2 · Games = 5 · +0.1 vs Losses
Losses0.1 · Games = 7 · -0.1 vs Wins