Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2020 Regular Season
Florida International paired 595 primary output with 68.6 efficiency.
Player Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Scrimmage | Rush Yds | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 Regular Season | Florida International | 7 | 176 | 131 | 45 | 0 | 43.3 |
| 2018 Postseason | Florida International | 13 | 39 | 39 | 0 | 0 | 58.8 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Florida International | 13 | 655 | 539 | 116 | 5 | 58.8 |
| 2019 Postseason | Florida International | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 35.9 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Florida International | 11 | 297 | 249 | 48 | 0 | 35.9 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Florida International | 5 | 595 | 581 | 14 | 5 | 81.4 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Florida International | 9 | 765 | 682 | 83 | 6 | 74.7 |
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2020 Regular Season
Florida International paired 595 primary output with 68.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2021 Regular Season role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 50.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2021 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Texas State
Loss driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 88.9th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
9
Scrimmage Yards / G
85
Efficiency
50.8
Usage
31.4
Consistency
58.2
Best Game by takeover score
Texas State
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Long Island University: 165. Texas State: 131. Texas Tech: 55. Central Michigan: 65. Florida Atlantic: 60. Charlotte: 107. Western Kentucky: 89. Marshall: 48. Old Dominion: 45
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Long Island University: 5 by 100. Texas State: 24 by 52.9. Texas Tech: 16 by 35.6. Central Michigan: 19 by 32.6. Florida Atlantic: 18 by 27.2. Charlotte: 19 by 54.4. Western Kentucky: 17 by 57.6. Marshall: 11 by 50.1. Old Dominion: 10 by 46.9
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.