Usage Score
2.4
Player Dossier
2017-2021Missouri
DB • 6'3" • 206 lbs • Austin, TX, USA
Allie Green IV shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 15 disruption score.
Usage Score
2.4
Efficiency
15
Consistency
12.1
Season Value
9.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season · Tulsa
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Allie Green IV, DB. Best season Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season · Tulsa. Allie Green IV shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 15 disruption score.
Allie Green IV played DB for Tulsa and Missouri. Across 5 tracked seasons, Allie Green IV recorded 146 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2019 with Tulsa.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season
Tulsa paired 3 primary output with 11.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2021 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 15 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2021 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Tulsa, Missouri.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Texas A&M
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
11
Havoc Plays / G
0.4
Efficiency
15
Usage
2.4
Consistency
12.1
Best Game by takeover score
Army
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Army: 0. Central Michigan: 0. Kentucky: 0. Unknown: 1. Tennessee: 0. North Texas: 1. Texas A&M: 1. Georgia: 1. South Carolina: 0. Florida: 0. Arkansas: 0
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Army: 1 by 4.2. Central Michigan: 3 by 12.5. Kentucky: 1 by 4.2. Unknown: 4 by 26.7. Tennessee: 2 by 8.3. North Texas: 0 by 10. Texas A&M: 7 by 39.2. Georgia: 2 by 18.3. South Carolina: 3 by 12.5. Florida: 5 by 20.8. Arkansas: 2 by 8.3
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Texas A&M
Best efficiency game
39.2 vs Texas A&M
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu 12/23 | @ Army | L 22-24 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 11/26 | @ Arkansas | L 17-34 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/20 | vs Florida | W 24-23 | 5 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/13 | vs South Carolina | W 31-28 | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/6 | @ Georgia | L 6-43 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/16 | vs Texas A&M | L 14-35 | 7 | 6 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/9 | vs North Texas | W 48-35 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/2 | vs Tennessee | L 24-62 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/18 | vs Unknown | — | 4 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/11 | @ Kentucky | L 28-35 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/4 | vs Central Michigan | W 34-24 | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Tulsa
2017-2020
Opening stop
Missouri
2021
Final stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 Regular Season | Tulsa | 3 | 11.8 | 0.9 | — |
| 2018 Regular Season | Tulsa | 5 | 20 | 4 | 2 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Tulsa | 6 | 20.6 | 3.6 | 1 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Tulsa | 4 | 19.6 | 4.3 | -2 |
| 2021 Postseason | Missouri | 4 | 15 | 2.4 | 0 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Missouri | 4 | 15 | 2.4 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
South Florida
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2
Primary metric
2 disruption/tackle impact with 51.1 takeover score.
#2
Michigan State
1.5
Primary metric
Loss with 1.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1.5 disruption/tackle impact with 50.5 takeover score.
#3
Oklahoma State
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 49.8 takeover score.
#4
Texas A&M
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 48.6 takeover score.
#5
Unknown
1
Primary metric
Game with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 43.7 takeover score.
#1 Season by value score
2017 Regular Season · Tulsa
3 primary output · 11.8 efficiency · 0.9 usage
19.7
#2
2019 Regular Season · Tulsa
17.6
6 primary · 20.6 efficiency · 3.6 usage
#3
2018 Regular Season · Tulsa
17
5 primary · 20 efficiency · 4 usage
0
Impact games
1
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2017 · Rating 0.7819
Lyndon B Johnson · Johnson City, TX
Career Facts
2
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
146
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 46 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.