Usage Score
31.4
Player Dossier
2017-2022Tulsa
Keylon Stokes
WR • 5'10" • 202 lbs • Manvel, TX, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Keylon Stokes reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
87.4
Consistency
70.4
Season Value
71.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season · Tulsa
17181920202122
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Tulsa
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Wyoming
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Keylon Stokes, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season · Tulsa. Keylon Stokes reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season
Tulsa paired 1,224 primary output with 87.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2022 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 87.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2022 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Wyoming
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2022 Regular Season · Tulsa
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
102
Efficiency
87.4
Usage
31.4
Consistency
70.4
Best Game by takeover score
Houston
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Wyoming: 169. Northern Illinois: 135. Unknown: 153. Ole Miss: 50. Cincinnati: 106. Navy: 152. Temple: 37. SMU: 122. Tulane: 40. Memphis: 68. South Florida: 145. Houston: 47
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Wyoming: 11 by 100. Northern Illinois: 8 by 100. Unknown: 9 by 100. Ole Miss: 3 by 100. Cincinnati: 6 by 100. Navy: 7 by 100. Temple: 4 by 61.7. SMU: 5 by 100. Tulane: 4 by 66.7. Memphis: 6 by 75.6. South Florida: 6 by 100. Houston: 7 by 44.8
Split Comparison
Wins91 · n=4 · -10 vs Losses
Losses101 · n=7 · +10 vs Wins
First Half127.5 · n=6 · +51 vs Second Half
Second Half76.5 · n=6 · -51 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Wyoming
Best efficiency game
100 vs South Florida
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 11/27 | @ Houston | W 37-30 | — | 7 | 47 | 6.7 | 6.70 | 1 | 16 |
| Sat 11/19 | vs South Florida100 receiving yards | W 48-42 | — | 6 | 145 | 24.2 | 24.20 | 1 | 44 |
| Fri 11/11 | @ Memphis | L 10-26 | — | 6 | 68 | 11.3 | 11.30 | 1 | 20 |
| Sat 11/5 | vs Tulane | L 13-27 | — | 4 | 40 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 26 |
| Sat 10/29 | vs SMU100 receiving yards | L 34-45 | — | 5 | 122 | 24.4 | 24.40 | 1 | 50 |
| Fri 10/21 | @ Temple | W 27-16 | — | 4 | 37 | 7.2 | 9.30 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 10/8 | @ Navy100 receiving yards | L 21-53 | — | 7 | 152 | 19.4 | 21.70 | 1 | 76 |
| Sat 10/1 | vs Cincinnati100 receiving yards | L 21-31 | — | 6 | 106 | 16.1 | 17.70 | 0 | 41 |
| Sat 9/24 | @ Ole Miss | L 27-35 | — | 3 | 50 | 16.7 | 16.70 | 0 | 37 |
| Sat 9/17 | vs Unknown100 receiving yards · High volume | — | — | 9 | 153 | 17 | 17 | 1 | 46 |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Northern Illinois100 receiving yards · High volume | W 38-35 | — | 8 | 135 | 15 | 16.90 | 1 | 31 |
| Sat 9/3 | @ Wyoming100 receiving yards · High volume | L 37-40 | — | 11 | 169 | 15.4 | 15.40 | 1 | 33 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Tulsa
2017-2022
Opening stop
Season Progression
2017201820192020202020212022
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 Regular Season | Tulsa | 143 | 66.7 | 11.4 | — |
| 2018 Regular Season | Tulsa | 575 | 72.4 | 23.8 | 432 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Tulsa | 1,040 | 94.8 | 24.3 | 465 |
| 2020 Postseason | Tulsa | 644 | 86.9 | 27.2 | -396 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Tulsa | 644 | 86.9 | 27.2 | 0 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Tulsa | 148 | 69.1 | 20.7 | -496 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Tulsa | 1,224 | 87.4 | 31.4 | 1,076 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Wyoming
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
169
Primary metric
169 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
SMU
140
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
140 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Houston
144
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
144 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
SMU
122
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
122 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Unknown
96
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
96 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2022 Regular Season · Tulsa
1,224 primary output · 87.4 efficiency · 31.4 usage
71.9
#2
2019 Regular Season · Tulsa
69.9
1,040 primary · 94.8 efficiency · 24.3 usage
#3
2020 Postseason · Tulsa
58.8
644 primary · 86.9 efficiency · 27.2 usage
Milestones
14
100+ receiving yards
8
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2017 · Rating 0.8222
Manvel · Manvel, TX
- Committed To
- Tulsa
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2017
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
3,774
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 56 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.