Usage Score
17.7
Player Dossier
2018-2022Miami (OH)
WR • 5'8" • 171 lbs • Carmel, IN, USA
Jalen Walker reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
17.7
Efficiency
67.1
Consistency
65.5
Season Value
55.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason · Miami (OH)
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jalen Walker, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason · Miami (OH). Jalen Walker reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason
Miami (OH) paired 418 primary output with 84.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2022 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 67.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2022 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Bowling Green
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 90.9th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
23
Efficiency
67.1
Usage
17.7
Consistency
65.5
Best Game by takeover score
UAB
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. UAB: 30. Kentucky: 25. Unknown: 7. Cincinnati: 28. Northwestern: 8. Buffalo: 13. Kent State: 15. Bowling Green: 45. Western Michigan: 25. Ohio: 33. Northern Illinois: 0. Ball State: 47
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. UAB: 4 by 50. Kentucky: 4 by 41.7. Unknown: 3 by 15.6. Cincinnati: 1 by 100. Northwestern: 1 by 53.3. Buffalo: 2 by 43.3. Kent State: 1 by 100. Bowling Green: 3 by 100. Western Michigan: 3 by 55.6. Ohio: 2 by 100. Ball State: 4 by 78.3
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Bowling Green
Best efficiency game
100 vs Ohio
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/16 | @ UAB | L 20-24 | — | 4 | 30 | 7.5 | 7.50 | 0 | 13 |
| Wed 11/23 | vs Ball State | W 18-17 | — | 4 | 47 | 11.8 | 11.80 | 0 | 16 |
| Thu 11/17 | @ Northern Illinois | W 29-23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Wed 11/9 | vs Ohio | L 21-37 | — | 2 | 33 | 14.3 | 16.50 | 0 | 33 |
| Sat 10/22 | vs Western Michigan | L 10-16 | — | 3 | 25 | 8.3 | 8.30 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 10/15 | @ Bowling Green | L 13-17 | — | 3 | 45 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 30 |
| Sat 10/8 | vs Kent State | W 27-24 | — | 1 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 10/1 | @ Buffalo | L 20-24 | — | 2 | 13 | -0.3 | 6.50 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 9/24 | @ Northwestern | W 17-14 | — | 1 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 9/17 | vs Cincinnati | L 17-38 | — | 1 | 28 | 28 | 28 | 0 | 28 |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Unknown | — | — | 3 | 7 | 2.3 | 2.30 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 9/3 | @ Kentucky | L 13-37 | — | 4 | 25 | 6.3 | 6.30 | 0 | 9 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Miami (OH)
2018-2022
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 Regular Season | Miami (OH) | 140 | 76.5 | 11.4 | — |
| 2019 Postseason | Miami (OH) | 418 | 84.1 | 16 | 278 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Miami (OH) | 418 | 84.1 | 16 | 0 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Miami (OH) | 49 | 68.9 | 7.6 | -369 |
| 2021 Postseason | Miami (OH) | 398 | 64.1 | 15.2 | 349 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Miami (OH) | 398 | 64.1 | 15.2 | 0 |
| 2022 Postseason | Miami (OH) | 276 | 67.1 | 17.7 | -122 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Miami (OH) | 276 | 67.1 | 17.7 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Northern Illinois
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
138
Primary metric
138 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Buffalo
136
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
136 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Bowling Green
45
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
45 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Buffalo
33
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
33 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Ball State
47
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
47 receiving yards with a 78.3 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2019 Postseason · Miami (OH)
418 primary output · 84.1 efficiency · 16 usage
58.8
#2
2019 Regular Season · Miami (OH)
58.8
418 primary · 84.1 efficiency · 16 usage
#3
2021 Postseason · Miami (OH)
56.6
398 primary · 64.1 efficiency · 15.2 usage
2
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2017 · Rating 0.8115
Carmel · Carmel, IN
Career Facts
1
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
1,281
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 41 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Jalen Walker quick answers
Recruiting profile
3-star recruit