Usage Score
16.3
Player Dossier
2017-2021Middle Tennessee
Jimmy Marshall
WR • 6'5" • 234 lbs • Macon, GA, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Jimmy Marshall reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
64.9
Consistency
53.5
Season Value
58.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season · Middle Tennessee
17171818192021
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Middle Tennessee
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Rice
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jimmy Marshall, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season · Middle Tennessee. Jimmy Marshall reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season
Middle Tennessee paired 513 primary output with 82.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2021 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 64.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2021 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Virginia Tech
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2021 Regular Season · Middle Tennessee
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
42.5
Efficiency
64.9
Usage
16.3
Consistency
53.5
Best Game by takeover score
Florida Atlantic
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 15. Virginia Tech: 111. UTSA: 51. Charlotte: 73. Marshall: 2. Liberty: 77. UConn: 61. Southern Miss: 14. Western Kentucky: 22. Florida International: 51. Old Dominion: 17. Florida Atlantic: 16
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 2 by 50. Virginia Tech: 8 by 92.5. UTSA: 2 by 100. Charlotte: 5 by 97.3. Marshall: 1 by 13.3. Liberty: 7 by 73.3. UConn: 4 by 100. Southern Miss: 2 by 46.7. Western Kentucky: 5 by 29.3. Florida International: 4 by 85. Old Dominion: 3 by 37.8. Florida Atlantic: 2 by 53.3
Split Comparison
Wins28.8 · n=5 · -29.7 vs Losses
Losses58.5 · n=6 · +29.7 vs Wins
First Half54.8 · n=6 · +24.7 vs Second Half
Second Half30.2 · n=6 · -24.7 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Virginia Tech
Best efficiency game
100 vs UConn
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 11/28 | @ Florida Atlantic | W 27-17 | — | 2 | 16 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 11/20 | vs Old Dominion | L 17-24 | — | 3 | 17 | 5.7 | 5.70 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 11/13 | vs Florida International | W 50-10 | — | 4 | 51 | 12.8 | 12.80 | 1 | 17 |
| Sat 11/6 | @ Western Kentucky | L 21-48 | — | 5 | 22 | 4.4 | 4.40 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 10/30 | vs Southern Miss | W 35-10 | — | 2 | 14 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 12 |
| Fri 10/22 | @ UConn2+ TD | W 44-13 | — | 4 | 61 | 15.3 | 15.30 | 2 | 22 |
| Sat 10/9 | @ Liberty | L 13-41 | — | 7 | 77 | 11 | 11 | 1 | 37 |
| Sat 10/2 | vs Marshall | W 34-28 | — | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Fri 9/24 | @ Charlotte | L 39-42 | — | 5 | 73 | 14.6 | 14.60 | 1 | 26 |
| Sat 9/18 | @ UTSA | L 13-27 | — | 2 | 51 | 25.5 | 25.50 | 1 | 28 |
| Sat 9/11 | @ Virginia Tech100 receiving yards · High volume | L 14-35 | — | 8 | 111 | 13.9 | 13.90 | 0 | 26 |
| Sat 9/4 | vs Unknown | — | — | 2 | 15 | 7.5 | 7.50 | 0 | 10 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Middle Tennessee
2017-2021
Opening stop
Season Progression
2017201720182018201920202021
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 Postseason | Middle Tennessee | 79 | 59.5 | 5.9 | — |
| 2017 Regular Season | Middle Tennessee | 79 | 59.5 | 5.9 | 0 |
| 2018 Postseason | Middle Tennessee | 96 | 100 | 4.1 | 17 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Middle Tennessee | 96 | 100 | 4.1 | 0 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Middle Tennessee | 513 | 82.3 | 18.9 | 417 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Middle Tennessee | 63 | 41.3 | 6.8 | -450 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Middle Tennessee | 510 | 64.9 | 16.3 | 447 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Rice
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
112
Primary metric
112 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Virginia Tech
111
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
111 receiving yards with a 92.5 efficiency score.
#3
Old Dominion
22
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
22 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
App State
28
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
28 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
UAB
26
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
26 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2019 Regular Season · Middle Tennessee
513 primary output · 82.3 efficiency · 18.9 usage
65.2
#2
2021 Regular Season · Middle Tennessee
58.1
510 primary · 64.9 efficiency · 16.3 usage
#3
2018 Postseason · Middle Tennessee
51.9
96 primary · 100 efficiency · 4.1 usage
Milestones
2
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
2
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2017 · Rating 0.7972
Tattnall Square Academy · Macon, GA
- Committed To
- Middle Tennessee
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2017
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
1,261
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 39 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.