Player Stats

D.Q. Thomas College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
95
TFL
19
Sacks
7.5
QB hurries
3
Passes defended
2
Touchdowns
2

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2014 Regular SeasonMiddle Tennessee00-0--0-
2015 Regular SeasonMiddle Tennessee00-0--0-
2016 Regular SeasonMiddle Tennessee00-0--0-
2017 Regular SeasonMiddle Tennessee792.521-019.6
2018 Regular SeasonSouthern Miss81630-1018.2
2018 Regular SeasonMiddle Tennessee80-0--018.2
2019 PostseasonSouthern Miss13810.5--076.1
2019 Regular SeasonSouthern Miss136212.5521276.1
2019 Regular SeasonMiddle Tennessee130-0--076.1

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason

Southern Miss paired 25 primary output with 41.7 efficiency.

Supporting note

2019 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 41.7 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Middle Tennessee, Southern Miss.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Alabama

Loss with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2019 Postseason · Southern Miss

Games

13

Havoc Plays / G

1.9

Efficiency

41.7

Usage

13.7

Consistency

62.9

Best Game by takeover score

Alabama

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Tulane: 1.5. Alcorn State: 3. Mississippi State: 0. Troy: 4. Alabama: 4. UTEP: 0. North Texas: 0.5. Louisiana Tech: 2. Rice: 2. UAB: 2. UTSA: 3. Western Kentucky: 3. Florida Atlantic: 0

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Tulane: 8 by 48.3. Alcorn State: 7 by 59.2. Mississippi State: 8 by 33.3. Troy: 9 by 77.5. Alabama: 10 by 81.7. UTEP: 6 by 25. North Texas: 5 by 25.8. Louisiana Tech: 5 by 40.8. Rice: 3 by 32.5. UAB: 3 by 32.5. UTSA: 1 by 34.2. Western Kentucky: 5 by 50.8

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins2.1 · Games = 7 · +0.3 vs Losses
Losses1.8 · Games = 6 · -0.3 vs Wins