Usage Score
4.2
Player Dossier
2017-2021Tulane
Jaylon Monroe
CB • 5'9" • 180 lbs • Dallas, TX, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Jaylon Monroe shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 31.4 disruption score.
Efficiency
31.4
Consistency
40.1
Season Value
26
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season · Tulane
1718181919202021
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 8
- Program Path
- Tulane
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Temple
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jaylon Monroe, CB. Best season Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season · Tulane. Jaylon Monroe shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 31.4 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season
Tulane paired 0 primary output with 4.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2021 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 31.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2021 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Memphis
Loss with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2021 Regular Season · Tulane
Games
11
Havoc Plays / G
1.3
Efficiency
31.4
Usage
4.2
Consistency
40.1
Best Game by takeover score
Memphis
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Oklahoma: 1. Ole Miss: 1. UAB: 0. East Carolina: 2.5. Houston: 1. SMU: 1. Cincinnati: 1. UCF: 1. Tulsa: 2. South Florida: 0. Memphis: 4
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Oklahoma: 2 by 18.3. Ole Miss: 6 by 35. UAB: 5 by 20.8. East Carolina: 7 by 54.2. Houston: 1 by 14.2. SMU: 3 by 22.5. Cincinnati: 6 by 35. UCF: 6 by 35. Tulsa: 5 by 40.8. South Florida: 2 by 8.3. Memphis: 5 by 60.8
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Losses1.4 · Games = 10
First Half1.1 · Games = 6 · -0.5 vs Second Half
Second Half1.6 · Games = 5 · +0.5 vs First Half
All Games1.3 · Games = 11
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Memphis
Best efficiency game
60.8 vs Memphis
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 11/28 | @ Memphis | L 28-33 | 5 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 4 | — | — |
| Sat 11/20 | vs South Florida | W 45-14 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/13 | vs Tulsa | L 13-20 | 5 | 2 | — | 1.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/6 | @ UCF | L 10-14 | 6 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/30 | vs Cincinnati | L 12-31 | 6 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Thu 10/21 | @ SMU | L 26-55 | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Thu 10/7 | vs Houston | L 22-40 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/2 | @ East Carolina | L 29-52 | 7 | 3 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Sun 9/26 | vs UAB | L 21-28 | 5 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/19 | @ Ole Miss | L 21-61 | 6 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/4 | @ Oklahoma | L 35-40 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Tulane
2017-2021
Opening stop
Season Progression
20172018201820192019202020202021
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 Regular Season | Tulane | 0 | 4.2 | 0.9 | — |
| 2018 Postseason | Tulane | 7 | 21.2 | 2.4 | 7 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Tulane | 7 | 21.2 | 2.4 | 0 |
| 2019 Postseason | Tulane | 8.5 | 18.7 | 6 | 1.5 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Tulane | 8.5 | 18.7 | 6 | 0 |
| 2020 Postseason | Tulane | 11 | 24.7 | 3.3 | 2.5 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Tulane | 11 | 24.7 | 3.3 | 0 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Tulane | 14.5 | 31.4 | 4.2 | 3.5 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Temple
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3
Primary metric
3 disruption/tackle impact with 57.9 takeover score.
#2
East Carolina
4
Primary metric
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 55.1 takeover score.
#3
Memphis
4
Primary metric
Loss with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 55.1 takeover score.
#4
South Alabama
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 49.3 takeover score.
#5
East Carolina
2.5
Primary metric
Loss with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2.5 disruption/tackle impact with 41.5 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2017 Regular Season · Tulane
0 primary output · 4.2 efficiency · 0.9 usage
35
#2
2020 Postseason · Tulane
27
11 primary · 24.7 efficiency · 3.3 usage
#3
2020 Regular Season · Tulane
27
11 primary · 24.7 efficiency · 3.3 usage
Milestones
0
Impact games
1
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2017 · Rating 0.7893
West Mesquite · Mesquite, TX
- Committed To
- Tulane
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2017
Career Facts
1
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
149
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 44 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.