Usage Score
10.6
Player Dossier
2017-2021North Texas
Tyreke Davis
LB • 5'10" • 220 lbs • Denton, TX, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Tyreke Davis shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 33.7 disruption score.
Efficiency
33.7
Consistency
60.5
Season Value
30.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason · North Texas
171718181920202121
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 9
- Program Path
- North Texas
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Houston
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Tyreke Davis, LB. Best season Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason · North Texas. Tyreke Davis shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 33.7 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason
North Texas paired 0 primary output with 7.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2021 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 33.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2021 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UAB
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2021 Postseason · North Texas
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
1.0
Efficiency
33.7
Usage
10.6
Consistency
60.5
Best Game by takeover score
Miami (OH)
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Miami (OH): 1. Unknown: 1. SMU: 1. UAB: 3. Louisiana Tech: 0. Missouri: 1. Marshall: 0. Liberty: 0. Rice: 1. Southern Miss: 2. UTEP: 1. Florida International: 1.5. UTSA: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Miami (OH): 7 by 39.2. Unknown: 7 by 39.2. SMU: 6 by 35. UAB: 8 by 63.3. Louisiana Tech: 4 by 16.7. Missouri: 6 by 35. Marshall: 3 by 12.5. Liberty: 5 by 20.8. Rice: 6 by 35. Southern Miss: 9 by 57.5. UTEP: 4 by 26.7. Florida International: 4 by 31.7. UTSA: 6 by 25
Split Comparison
Wins1.1 · n=5 · +0.2 vs Losses
Losses0.9 · n=7 · -0.2 vs Wins
First Half1 · n=7 · +0.1 vs Second Half
Second Half0.9 · n=6 · -0.1 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
UAB
Best efficiency game
63.3 vs UAB
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu 12/23 | @ Miami (OH) | L 14-27 | 7 | 4 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/27 | vs UTSA | W 45-23 | 6 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/21 | @ Florida International | W 49-7 | 4 | 1 | — | 1 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/13 | vs UTEP | W 20-17 | 4 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/6 | @ Southern MissSplash game | W 38-14 | 9 | 7 | — | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/30 | @ Rice | W 30-24 | 6 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/23 | vs Liberty | L 26-35 | 5 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 10/15 | vs Marshall | L 21-49 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/9 | @ Missouri | L 35-48 | 6 | 5 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/25 | @ Louisiana Tech | L 17-24 | 4 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/18 | vs UABSplash game | L 6-40 | 8 | 5 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/11 | @ SMU | L 12-35 | 6 | 5 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/4 | vs Unknown | — | 7 | 4 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
North Texas
2017-2021
Opening stop
Season Progression
201720172018201820192020202020212021
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 Postseason | North Texas | 0 | 7.9 | 1.3 | — |
| 2017 Regular Season | North Texas | 0 | 7.9 | 1.3 | 0 |
| 2018 Postseason | North Texas | 3.5 | 18.7 | 4 | 3.5 |
| 2018 Regular Season | North Texas | 3.5 | 18.7 | 4 | 0 |
| 2019 Regular Season | North Texas | 19.5 | 43.7 | 15.7 | 16 |
| 2020 Postseason | North Texas | 4.5 | 30.4 | 6.4 | -15 |
| 2020 Regular Season | North Texas | 4.5 | 30.4 | 6.4 | 0 |
| 2021 Postseason | North Texas | 12.5 | 33.7 | 10.6 | 8 |
| 2021 Regular Season | North Texas | 12.5 | 33.7 | 10.6 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Houston
Loss with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4
Primary metric
4 disruption/tackle impact with 66.4 takeover score.
#2
UAB
3
Primary metric
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 64.9 takeover score.
#3
Middle Tennessee
3.5
Primary metric
Win with 3.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3.5 disruption/tackle impact with 61.1 takeover score.
#4
Charlotte
3
Primary metric
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 60.4 takeover score.
#5
UTEP
1.5
Primary metric
Win with 1.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1.5 disruption/tackle impact with 50.2 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2017 Postseason · North Texas
0 primary output · 7.9 efficiency · 1.3 usage
36.4
#2
2017 Regular Season · North Texas
36.4
0 primary · 7.9 efficiency · 1.3 usage
#3
2019 Regular Season · North Texas
31.9
19.5 primary · 43.7 efficiency · 15.7 usage
Milestones
4
Impact games
4
Splash games
4
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2017 · Rating 0.7926
Ryan · Denton, TX
- Committed To
- North Texas
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2017
Career Facts
1
Career teams
9
Seasons tracked
254
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 9 tracked seasons, 53 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.