Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2020 Regular Season
North Texas paired 1,190 primary output with 91 efficiency.
Player Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Rec | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 Postseason | North Texas | 13 | - | 0 | 0 | 46.6 |
| 2017 Regular Season | North Texas | 13 | 32 | 281 | 5 | 46.6 |
| 2018 Postseason | North Texas | 13 | 2 | 8 | 0 | 49 |
| 2018 Regular Season | North Texas | 13 | 46 | 567 | 4 | 49 |
| 2019 Regular Season | North Texas | 12 | 76 | 736 | 12 | 68.9 |
| 2020 Regular Season | North Texas | 9 | 74 | 1,190 | 19 | 90.1 |
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2020 Regular Season
North Texas paired 1,190 primary output with 91 efficiency.
Supporting note
2020 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 91 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2020 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Charlotte
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
9
Receiving Yards / G
132.2
Efficiency
91
Usage
45.6
Consistency
69.4
Best Game by takeover score
Charlotte
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Houston Christian: 71. SMU: 66. Southern Miss: 104. Charlotte: 244. Middle Tennessee: 204. Rice: 50. UTSA: 143. Louisiana Tech: 135. UTEP: 173
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Houston Christian: 5 by 94.7. SMU: 5 by 88. Southern Miss: 13 by 53.3. Charlotte: 13 by 100. Middle Tennessee: 10 by 100. Rice: 4 by 83.3. UTSA: 8 by 100. Louisiana Tech: 8 by 100. UTEP: 8 by 100
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.