Player Stats

Willie Wright College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
1,447
Receptions
142
Touchdowns
11

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2017 PostseasonFlorida Atlantic12771276.6
2017 Regular SeasonFlorida Atlantic1249586576.6
2018 Regular SeasonFlorida Atlantic1145417265.8
2019 PostseasonFlorida Atlantic8825039.2
2019 Regular SeasonFlorida Atlantic812127239.2
2020 Regular SeasonFlorida Atlantic715117046.1
2021 Regular SeasonFlorida Atlantic56104035.2

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason

Florida Atlantic paired 657 primary output with 66.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

2021 Regular Season role shape

target-driven usage with 69.2 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value cooled off

2021 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Marshall

Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2021 Regular Season · Florida Atlantic

Games

5

Receiving Yards / G

20.8

Efficiency

69.2

Usage

7

Consistency

32.6

Best Game by takeover score

Marshall

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Fordham: 17. UAB: 12. Charlotte: 0. Marshall: 69. Middle Tennessee: 6

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Fordham: 2 by 56.7. UAB: 1 by 80. Marshall: 2 by 100. Middle Tennessee: 1 by 40

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins8.5 · Games = 2 · -20.5 vs Losses
Losses29 · Games = 3 · +20.5 vs Wins