Player Stats

Greg McCrae College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
2,911
Rushing yards
2,620
Receiving yards
291
Touchdowns
30

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2017 Regular SeasonUCF1016415113225.5
2018 PostseasonUCF1383812171.3
2018 Regular SeasonUCF131,2151,1011141071.3
2019 PostseasonUCF10988018152.9
2019 Regular SeasonUCF1049544946652.9
2020 PostseasonUCF10907713162.3
2020 Regular SeasonUCF1076668185962.3

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason

UCF paired 1,298 primary output with 81.8 efficiency.

Supporting note

2020 Postseason role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 49.6 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2020 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Tulane

Win driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2020 Postseason · UCF

Games

10

Scrimmage Yards / G

85.6

Efficiency

49.6

Usage

23.5

Consistency

66.5

Best Game by takeover score

Tulane

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. BYU: 90. Georgia Tech: 50. East Carolina: 83. Tulsa: 20. Memphis: 105. Tulane: 177. Houston: 107. Temple: 40. Cincinnati: 22. South Florida: 162

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. BYU: 20 by 45.5. Georgia Tech: 9 by 57.9. East Carolina: 16 by 54. Tulsa: 7 by 28.6. Memphis: 21 by 49.5. Tulane: 26 by 68.9. Houston: 16 by 69.7. Temple: 11 by 37.7. Cincinnati: 8 by 28.4. South Florida: 29 by 55.8

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins103.2 · Games = 6 · +43.9 vs Losses
Losses59.3 · Games = 4 · -43.9 vs Wins