Player Stats

Dionte Ruffin College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
78
TFL
1
Passes defended
24

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2017 PostseasonWestern Kentucky32-0--07.2
2017 Regular SeasonWestern Kentucky30-0-107.2
2018 Regular SeasonWestern Kentucky1128-0-3015.1
2019 PostseasonWestern Kentucky132-0--041.4
2019 Regular SeasonWestern Kentucky132310-9041.4
2020 PostseasonWestern Kentucky111-0--049.4
2020 Regular SeasonWestern Kentucky1122-0-11049.4

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2020 Postseason

Western Kentucky paired 12 primary output with 19.6 efficiency.

Supporting note

2020 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 19.6 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2020 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: BYU

Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 90.9th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2020 Postseason · Western Kentucky

Games

11

Havoc Plays / G

1.1

Efficiency

19.6

Usage

2.8

Consistency

54.7

Best Game by takeover score

BYU

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Georgia State: 0. Louisville: 0. Liberty: 3. Middle Tennessee: 0. Marshall: 0. UAB: 2. Chattanooga: 1. BYU: 2. Southern Miss: 1. Florida International: 2. Charlotte: 1

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Georgia State: 1 by 4.2. Louisville: 1 by 4.2. Liberty: 2 by 38.3. Middle Tennessee: 1 by 4.2. Marshall: 4 by 16.7. UAB: 5 by 40.8. Chattanooga: 0 by 10. BYU: 1 by 24.2. Southern Miss: 5 by 30.8. Florida International: 2 by 28.3. Charlotte: 1 by 14.2

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins1 · Games = 5 · -0.2 vs Losses
Losses1.2 · Games = 6 · +0.2 vs Wins