Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason
Arizona State paired 1,903 primary output with 54 efficiency.
Player Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Scrimmage | Rush Yds | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 Postseason | Arizona State | 9 | 61 | 42 | 19 | 0 | 23.5 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Arizona State | 9 | 96 | 100 | -4 | 3 | 23.5 |
| 2018 Postseason | Arizona State | 13 | 134 | 118 | 16 | 1 | 81.4 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Arizona State | 13 | 1,769 | 1,524 | 245 | 17 | 81.4 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Arizona State | 12 | 1,430 | 1,083 | 347 | 12 | 74.9 |
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason
Arizona State paired 1,903 primary output with 54 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Regular Season role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 47.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2019 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Washington State
Win with 171 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 91.7th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Scrimmage Yards / G
119.2
Efficiency
47.4
Usage
45.3
Consistency
77
Best Game by takeover score
Washington State
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Kent State: 134. Sacramento State: 163. Michigan State: 49. Colorado: 83. California: 114. Washington State: 171. Utah: 104. UCLA: 65. USC: 100. Oregon State: 97. Oregon: 168. Arizona: 182
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Kent State: 25 by 51.3. Sacramento State: 28 by 42.2. Michigan State: 13 by 37.3. Colorado: 22 by 41.7. California: 31 by 36.9. Washington State: 25 by 73.6. Utah: 15 by 72.2. UCLA: 16 by 39. USC: 27 by 31.7. Oregon State: 20 by 49.4. Oregon: 36 by 42.4. Arizona: 37 by 51.4
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.