Player Stats

Eno Benjamin College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
3,490
Rushing yards
2,867
Receiving yards
623
Touchdowns
33

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2017 PostseasonArizona State9614219023.5
2017 Regular SeasonArizona State996100-4323.5
2018 PostseasonArizona State1313411816181.4
2018 Regular SeasonArizona State131,7691,5242451781.4
2019 Regular SeasonArizona State121,4301,0833471274.9

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason

Arizona State paired 1,903 primary output with 54 efficiency.

Supporting note

2019 Regular Season role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 47.4 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value cooled off

2019 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Washington State

Win with 171 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 91.7th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2019 Regular Season · Arizona State

Games

12

Scrimmage Yards / G

119.2

Efficiency

47.4

Usage

45.3

Consistency

77

Best Game by takeover score

Washington State

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789101112

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Kent State: 134. Sacramento State: 163. Michigan State: 49. Colorado: 83. California: 114. Washington State: 171. Utah: 104. UCLA: 65. USC: 100. Oregon State: 97. Oregon: 168. Arizona: 182

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Kent State: 25 by 51.3. Sacramento State: 28 by 42.2. Michigan State: 13 by 37.3. Colorado: 22 by 41.7. California: 31 by 36.9. Washington State: 25 by 73.6. Utah: 15 by 72.2. UCLA: 16 by 39. USC: 27 by 31.7. Oregon State: 20 by 49.4. Oregon: 36 by 42.4. Arizona: 37 by 51.4

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins140.1 · Games = 7 · +50.3 vs Losses
Losses89.8 · Games = 5 · -50.3 vs Wins