Usage Score
0
Player Dossier
2017-2022Stanford
FB • 5'11" • 265 lbs • Woods Cross, UT, USA
Houston Heimuli leans balanced backfield option traits and partial efficiency context.
Usage Score
0
Efficiency
—
Consistency
100
Season Value
50
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season · BYU
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Houston Heimuli, FB. Best season Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season · BYU. Houston Heimuli leans balanced backfield option traits and partial efficiency context.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season
BYU paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2022 Regular Season role shape
backfield-heavy usage with — efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2022 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Stanford, BYU.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Baylor
Win with 0 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
1
Scrimmage Yards / G
0
Efficiency
—
Usage
0
Consistency
100
Best Game by takeover score
Baylor
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
1 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Baylor
Best efficiency game
— vs Baylor
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 9/11 | vs Baylor | W 26-20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Stanford
2017-2021
Opening stop
BYU
2022
Final stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 Regular Season | Stanford | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2018 Regular Season | Stanford | 1 | 8.3 | 0.9 | 1 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Stanford | 3 | 16.7 | 1.7 | 2 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Stanford | 10 | 41.7 | 1.1 | 7 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Stanford | 18 | 75 | 0.8 | 8 |
| 2022 Regular Season | BYU | 0 | — | 0 | -18 |
#1 Featured game
Washington
Loss with 11 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
11
Primary metric
11 scrimmage yards and 2.1 usage.
#2
Oregon State
7
Primary metric
Win with 7 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
7 scrimmage yards and 1.8 usage.
#3
Northwestern
4
Primary metric
Win with 4 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
4 scrimmage yards and 1.6 usage.
#4
Vanderbilt
7
Primary metric
Win with 7 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
7 scrimmage yards and 2.1 usage.
#5
Washington State
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
1 scrimmage yards and 1.8 usage.
#1 Season by value score
2022 Regular Season · BYU
0 primary output · — efficiency · 0 usage
50
#2
2021 Regular Season · Stanford
42.7
18 primary · 75 efficiency · 0.8 usage
#3
2020 Regular Season · Stanford
36.3
10 primary · 41.7 efficiency · 1.1 usage
0
100+ rush yards
0
150+ scrimmage yards
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2015 · Rating 0.8281
Bountiful · Bountiful, UT
Career Facts
2
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
32
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 14 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Houston Heimuli quick answers
Recruiting profile
3-star recruit