Usage Score
8.2
Player Dossier
2017-2020Oregon
Thomas Graham Jr.
CB • 5'11" • 193 lbs • Rancho Cucamonga, CA, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Thomas Graham Jr. shows a ball-hunting defender profile with partial disruption data.
Efficiency
31.2
Consistency
68.8
Season Value
34.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason · Oregon
17171818191920
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Oregon
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Nebraska
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Thomas Graham Jr., CB. Best season Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason · Oregon. Thomas Graham Jr. shows a ball-hunting defender profile with partial disruption data.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason
Oregon paired 17 primary output with 31.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 31.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2020 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Wisconsin
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2019 Postseason · Oregon
Games
14
Havoc Plays / G
1.2
Efficiency
31.2
Usage
8.2
Consistency
68.8
Best Game by takeover score
Wisconsin
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011121314
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Wisconsin: 3. Auburn: 2. Nevada: 1. Unknown: 0. Stanford: 2. California: 1. Colorado: 1.5. Washington: 1. Washington State: 1.5. USC: 1. Arizona: 1. Arizona State: 0. Oregon State: 1. Utah: 1
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Wisconsin: 6 by 55. Auburn: 4 by 36.7. Nevada: 2 by 18.3. Unknown: 1 by 4.2. Stanford: 9 by 57.5. California: 2 by 18.3. Colorado: 5 by 35.8. Washington: 7 by 39.2. Washington State: 4 by 31.7. USC: 4 by 26.7. Arizona: 4 by 26.7. Arizona State: 5 by 20.8. Oregon State: 8 by 43.3. Utah: 3 by 22.5
Split Comparison
Wins1.4 · n=11 · +0.4 vs Losses
Losses1 · n=2 · -0.4 vs Wins
First Half1.5 · n=7 · +0.6 vs Second Half
Second Half0.9 · n=7 · -0.6 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
14 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Wisconsin
Best efficiency game
57.5 vs Stanford
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 1/1 | @ WisconsinSplash game | W 28-27 | 6 | 3 | — | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 12/7 | vs Utah | W 37-15 | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/30 | vs Oregon State | W 24-10 | 8 | 7 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/24 | @ Arizona State | L 28-31 | 5 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/17 | vs Arizona | W 34-6 | 4 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sun 11/3 | @ USC | W 56-24 | 4 | 2 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 10/27 | vs Washington State | W 37-35 | 4 | 2 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/19 | @ Washington | W 35-31 | 7 | 7 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/12 | vs Colorado | W 45-3 | 5 | 4 | — | 1.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 10/6 | vs California | W 17-7 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/21 | @ Stanford | W 21-6 | 9 | 6 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Sun 9/15 | vs Unknown | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/7 | vs Nevada | W 77-6 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 8/31 | @ Auburn | L 21-27 | 4 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Oregon
2017-2020
Opening stop
Season Progression
2017201720182018201920192020
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 Postseason | Oregon | 8 | 26 | 5.4 | — |
| 2017 Regular Season | Oregon | 8 | 26 | 5.4 | 0 |
| 2018 Postseason | Oregon | 22.5 | 34.2 | 9.9 | 14.5 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Oregon | 22.5 | 34.2 | 9.9 | 0 |
| 2019 Postseason | Oregon | 17 | 31.2 | 8.2 | -5.5 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Oregon | 17 | 31.2 | 8.2 | 0 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Oregon | 0 | — | — | -17 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Nebraska
Win with 5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
5
Primary metric
5 disruption/tackle impact with 68.3 takeover score.
#2
Wisconsin
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 64 takeover score.
#3
Arizona State
6
Primary metric
Win with 6 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
6 disruption/tackle impact with 54.8 takeover score.
#4
Arizona
3
Primary metric
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 46.5 takeover score.
#5
Stanford
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 43.7 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2019 Postseason · Oregon
17 primary output · 31.2 efficiency · 8.2 usage
34.3
#2
2019 Regular Season · Oregon
34.3
17 primary · 31.2 efficiency · 8.2 usage
#3
2018 Postseason · Oregon
32.7
22.5 primary · 34.2 efficiency · 9.9 usage
Milestones
2
Impact games
4
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2017 · Rating 0.9603
Rancho Cucamonga · Rancho Cucamonga, CA
- Committed To
- Oregon
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2017
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
168
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 39 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.