Player Stats

C.J. Holmes College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
55
TFL
0.5
QB hurries
1
Passes defended
2

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2016 Regular SeasonNotre Dame00-0--0-
2017 Regular SeasonNotre Dame33-0--036.9
2019 Regular SeasonPenn State12-0--041.4
2020 Regular SeasonKent State36-0-1019
2021 PostseasonKent State114-0--039.5
2021 Regular SeasonKent State11400.5011039.5
2022 Regular SeasonKent State00-0--0-

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season

Penn State paired 0 primary output with 8.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

2021 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 19 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value cooled off

2022 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 3 team stops, with role shifts visible across Notre Dame, Penn State, Kent State.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Buffalo

Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2021 Postseason · Kent State

Games

11

Havoc Plays / G

0.2

Efficiency

19

Usage

3.6

Consistency

9.1

Best Game by takeover score

Buffalo

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Wyoming: 0. Texas A&M: 0.5. VMI: 0. Iowa: 0. Maryland: 0. Bowling Green: 0. Buffalo: 1. Western Michigan: 1. Northern Illinois: 0. Central Michigan: 0. Akron: 0

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Wyoming: 4 by 16.7. Texas A&M: 8 by 38.3. VMI: 5 by 20.8. Iowa: 1 by 4.2. Maryland: 1 by 4.2. Bowling Green: 4 by 16.7. Buffalo: 4 by 26.7. Western Michigan: 5 by 30.8. Northern Illinois: 1 by 4.2. Central Michigan: 10 by 41.7. Akron: 1 by 4.2

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins0.2 · Games = 5 · -0.0 vs Losses
Losses0.3 · Games = 6 · +0.0 vs Wins