Player Stats

Matt Bushman College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
1,719
Receptions
125
Touchdowns
9

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2017 Regular SeasonBYU1349520368.8
2018 PostseasonBYU11452071.2
2018 Regular SeasonBYU1125459271.2
2019 PostseasonBYU12691078.4
2019 Regular SeasonBYU1241597478.4
2020 Regular SeasonBYU0-00-

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason

BYU paired 688 primary output with 91 efficiency.

Supporting note

2019 Postseason role shape

target-driven usage with 91 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value cooled off

2020 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Boise State

Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2019 Postseason · BYU

Games

12

Receiving Yards / G

57.3

Efficiency

91

Usage

17.5

Consistency

64.2

Best Game by takeover score

Boise State

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789101112

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Hawai'i: 91. Utah: 62. Tennessee: 40. USC: 17. Washington: 89. Toledo: 45. South Florida: 44. Boise State: 101. Liberty: 86. Idaho State: 18. Massachusetts: 36. San Diego State: 59

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Hawai'i: 6 by 100. Utah: 6 by 68.9. Tennessee: 2 by 100. USC: 1 by 100. Washington: 6 by 98.9. Toledo: 3 by 100. South Florida: 5 by 58.7. Boise State: 5 by 100. Liberty: 4 by 100. Idaho State: 1 by 100. Massachusetts: 2 by 100. San Diego State: 6 by 65.6

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins49.7 · Games = 6 · -15.3 vs Losses
Losses65 · Games = 6 · +15.3 vs Wins