Usage Score
8.7
Player Dossier
2017-2019LSU
Jacob Phillips
LB • 6'4" • 233 lbs • Nashville, TN, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Jacob Phillips shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 37.7 disruption score.
Efficiency
37.7
Consistency
8.9
Season Value
16.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season · LSU
1717181919
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- LSU
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Louisiana Tech
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jacob Phillips, LB. Best season Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season · LSU. Jacob Phillips shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 37.7 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season
LSU paired 10.5 primary output with 40.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 37.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Vanderbilt
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2019 Postseason · LSU
Games
15
Havoc Plays / G
0.6
Efficiency
37.7
Usage
8.7
Consistency
8.9
Best Game by takeover score
Clemson
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112131415
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Clemson: 0.5. Oklahoma: 0. Georgia Southern: 0. Texas: 0. Unknown: 1. Vanderbilt: 3. Utah State: 0. Florida: 0. Mississippi State: 0. Auburn: 2. Alabama: 0.5. Ole Miss: 0. Arkansas: 2.5. Texas A&M: 0. Georgia: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Clemson: 8 by 38.3. Oklahoma: 8 by 33.3. Georgia Southern: 10 by 41.7. Texas: 7 by 29.2. Unknown: 8 by 43.3. Vanderbilt: 10 by 71.7. Utah State: 5 by 20.8. Florida: 9 by 37.5. Mississippi State: 8 by 33.3. Auburn: 7 by 49.2. Alabama: 7 by 34.2. Ole Miss: 11 by 45.8. Arkansas: 12 by 75. Texas A&M: 1 by 4.2. Georgia: 2 by 8.3
Split Comparison
Wins0.6 · n=14
First Half0.6 · n=8 · -0.2 vs Second Half
Second Half0.7 · n=7 · +0.2 vs First Half
All Games0.6 · n=15
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
15 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Vanderbilt
Best efficiency game
75 vs Arkansas
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue 1/14 | vs Clemson | W 42-25 | 8 | 5 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 12/28 | vs Oklahoma | W 63-28 | 8 | 6 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 12/7 | vs Georgia | W 37-10 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 12/1 | vs Texas A&M | W 50-7 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/24 | vs Arkansas10+ tackles · Splash game | W 56-20 | 12 | 5 | — | 2.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/17 | @ Ole Miss10+ tackles | W 58-37 | 11 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/9 | @ Alabama | W 46-41 | 7 | 2 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/26 | vs Auburn | W 23-20 | 7 | 2 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/19 | @ Mississippi State | W 36-13 | 8 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 10/13 | vs Florida | W 42-28 | 9 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/5 | vs Utah State | W 42-6 | 5 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/21 | @ Vanderbilt10+ tackles · Splash game | W 66-38 | 10 | 6 | — | 3 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/14 | vs Unknown | — | 8 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/7 | @ Texas | W 45-38 | 7 | 6 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 8/31 | vs Georgia Southern10+ tackles | W 55-3 | 10 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
LSU
2017-2019
Opening stop
Season Progression
20172017201820192019
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 Postseason | LSU | 1.5 | 12.9 | 2.5 | — |
| 2017 Regular Season | LSU | 1.5 | 12.9 | 2.5 | 0 |
| 2018 Regular Season | LSU | 10.5 | 40.6 | 9.2 | 9 |
| 2019 Postseason | LSU | 9.5 | 37.7 | 8.7 | -1 |
| 2019 Regular Season | LSU | 9.5 | 37.7 | 8.7 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Louisiana Tech
Win with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2.5
Primary metric
2.5 disruption/tackle impact with 64.6 takeover score.
#2
Vanderbilt
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 64 takeover score.
#3
Arkansas
2.5
Primary metric
Win with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2.5 disruption/tackle impact with 58.4 takeover score.
#4
Rice
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 47.5 takeover score.
#5
Auburn
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 45.1 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2018 Regular Season · LSU
10.5 primary output · 40.6 efficiency · 9.2 usage
30.8
#2
2019 Postseason · LSU
16.3
9.5 primary · 37.7 efficiency · 8.7 usage
#3
2019 Regular Season · LSU
16.3
9.5 primary · 37.7 efficiency · 8.7 usage
Milestones
2
Impact games
2
Splash games
7
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2017 · Rating 0.9719
East Nashville Magnet School · Nashville, TN
- Committed To
- LSU
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2017
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
214
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 33 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.