Player Dossier

2015-2019

Missouri

Jonathan Nance

WR • 6'0" • 190 lbs • Gulfport, MS, USA

Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher

Jonathan Nance reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.

Usage Score

14.3

Efficiency

79.4

Consistency

64.3

Season Value

58.4

Career Arc

Value trend by season

Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season · Missouri

1516171819

Snapshot

Career Teams
2
Seasons Tracked
5
Program Path
Arkansas • Missouri
Peak Game
Peak game by takeover score: South Carolina

Scouting Read

Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.

Jonathan Nance, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season · Missouri. Jonathan Nance reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.

Jonathan Nance played WR for Arkansas and Missouri. Across 5 tracked seasons, Jonathan Nance recorded 66 rushing yards, 995 receiving yards, and 1 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2017 with Arkansas.

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season

Missouri paired 458 primary output with 79.4 efficiency.

Supporting note

2019 Regular Season role shape

target-driven usage with 79.4 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value is trending up

2019 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Arkansas, Missouri.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Troy

Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2019 Regular Season · Missouri

Games

12

Receiving Yards / G

38.2

Efficiency

79.4

Usage

14.3

Consistency

64.3

Best Game by takeover score

Arkansas

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789101112

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Wyoming: 63. West Virginia: 3. Unknown: 18. South Carolina: 60. Troy: 81. Ole Miss: 25. Vanderbilt: 34. Kentucky: 23. Georgia: 45. Florida: 58. Tennessee: 10. Arkansas: 38

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Wyoming: 3 by 100. West Virginia: 1 by 20. Unknown: 1 by 100. South Carolina: 4 by 100. Troy: 2 by 100. Ole Miss: 2 by 83.3. Vanderbilt: 3 by 75.6. Kentucky: 3 by 51.1. Georgia: 4 by 75. Florida: 4 by 96.7. Tennessee: 1 by 66.7. Arkansas: 3 by 84.4

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins41.4 · Games = 5 · +2.6 vs Losses
Losses38.8 · Games = 6 · -2.6 vs Wins
First Half41.7 · Games = 6 · +7 vs Second Half
Second Half34.7 · Games = 6 · -7 vs First Half

Game Log

Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.

12 games

Featured metric

Receiving Yards

Top game by takeover score

Troy

Best efficiency game

100 vs Troy

Result
Fri 11/29@ ArkansasW 24-1433810.512.70117
Sun 11/24vs TennesseeL 20-241101010010
Sat 11/16vs FloridaL 6-2345814.514.50024
Sun 11/10@ GeorgiaL 0-2744511.311.30020
Sat 10/26@ KentuckyL 7-293237.77.7008
Sat 10/19@ VanderbiltL 14-2133411.311.30017
Sat 10/12vs Ole MissW 38-2722512.512.50018
Sat 10/5vs TroyW 42-1028140.540.50164
Sat 9/21vs South CarolinaW 34-144601515022
Sat 9/14vs Unknown1181818018
Sat 9/7vs West VirginiaW 38-7133303
Sat 8/31@ Wyoming2+ TDL 31-373632121253

Career Arc

Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.

  1. 1

    Arkansas

    2015-2018

    Opening stop

  2. 2

    Missouri

    2019

    Final stop

Season Progression

20152016201720182019
SeasonTeamPrimaryEfficiencyUsageDelta
2015 Regular SeasonArkansas0
2016 Regular SeasonArkansas00
2017 Regular SeasonArkansas53972.121.1539
2018 Regular SeasonArkansas-209.1-541
2019 Regular SeasonMissouri45879.414.3460

Signature Performances

Top Games

#1 Featured game

South Carolina

Loss with an explosive receiving profile.

116

Primary metric

116 receiving yards with a 96.7 efficiency score.

#2

Troy

81

Primary metric

Win with an explosive receiving profile.

81 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#3

Texas A&M

100

Primary metric

Loss with an explosive receiving profile.

100 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#4

TCU

75

Primary metric

Loss with an explosive receiving profile.

75 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#5

South Carolina

60

Primary metric

Win with an explosive receiving profile.

60 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

Top Seasons

#1 Season by value score

2019 Regular Season · Missouri

458 primary output · 79.4 efficiency · 14.3 usage

58.4

#2

2017 Regular Season · Arkansas

57.5

539 primary · 72.1 efficiency · 21.1 usage

#3

2018 Regular Season · Arkansas

25.3

-2 primary · 0 efficiency · 9.1 usage

Milestones

2

100+ receiving yards

1

8+ catch outings

2

2+ TD games

Bio, Recruit, and Data Context

Recruit Profile

2★

Class 2015 · Rating 0.7814

Gulfport · Gulfport, MS

Committed To
Southern Miss
Commit Date
Jan 1, 2015

Career Facts

2

Career teams

5

Seasons tracked

995

Career Receiving Yards

Data Context

Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 24 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.