Usage Score
10.2
Player Dossier
2016-2018Michigan State
WR • 5'11" • 203 lbs • Ann Arbor, MI, USA
Hunter Rison reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
10.2
Efficiency
62.3
Consistency
33.4
Season Value
50.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason · Michigan State
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Hunter Rison, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason · Michigan State. Hunter Rison reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason
Michigan State paired 224 primary output with 62.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 62.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2018 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Michigan State, Kansas State.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Notre Dame
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
18.7
Efficiency
62.3
Usage
10.2
Consistency
33.4
Best Game by takeover score
Washington State
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Washington State: 1. Bowling Green: 5. Western Michigan: 14. Notre Dame: 73. Iowa: 0. Michigan: 8. Minnesota: 30. Indiana: 13. Northwestern: 16. Penn State: 52. Ohio State: 12. Rutgers: 0
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Washington State: 1 by 6.7. Bowling Green: 1 by 33.3. Western Michigan: 1 by 93.3. Notre Dame: 4 by 100. Michigan: 1 by 53.3. Minnesota: 2 by 100. Indiana: 2 by 43.3. Northwestern: 2 by 53.3. Penn State: 3 by 100. Ohio State: 2 by 40
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Notre Dame
Best efficiency game
100 vs Penn State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/29 | vs Washington State | W 42-17 | — | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Sat 11/25 | @ Rutgers | W 40-7 | — | — | — | 4 | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/11 | @ Ohio State | L 3-48 | — | 2 | 12 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 11/4 | vs Penn State | W 27-24 | — | 3 | 52 | 17.3 | 17.30 | 0 | 26 |
| Sat 10/28 | @ Northwestern | L 31-39 | — | 2 | 16 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 10/21 | vs Indiana | W 17-9 | — | 2 | 13 | 6.5 | 6.50 | 0 | 9 |
| Sun 10/15 | @ Minnesota | W 30-27 | — | 2 | 30 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 10/7 | @ Michigan | W 14-10 | — | 1 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 9/30 | vs Iowa | W 17-10 | — | — | — | 9 | — | — | — |
| Sun 9/24 | vs Notre Dame | L 18-38 | — | 4 | 73 | 18.3 | 18.30 | 0 | 24 |
| Sat 9/9 | vs Western Michigan | W 28-14 | — | 1 | 14 | 6 | 14 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 9/2 | vs Bowling Green | W 35-10 | — | 1 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Michigan State
2016-2017
Opening stop
Kansas State
2018
Final stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Regular Season | Michigan State | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2017 Postseason | Michigan State | 224 | 62.3 | 10.2 | 224 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Michigan State | 224 | 62.3 | 10.2 | 0 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Kansas State | 0 | — | — | -224 |
#1 Featured game
Notre Dame
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
73
Primary metric
73 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Penn State
52
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
52 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Minnesota
30
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
30 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Western Michigan
14
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
14 receiving yards with a 93.3 efficiency score.
#5
Northwestern
16
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
16 receiving yards with a 53.3 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2017 Postseason · Michigan State
224 primary output · 62.3 efficiency · 10.2 usage
50.3
#2
2017 Regular Season · Michigan State
50.3
224 primary · 62.3 efficiency · 10.2 usage
#3
2016 Regular Season · Michigan State
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2017 · Rating 0.8954
Skyline · Ann Arbor, MI
Career Facts
2
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
224
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 12 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Hunter Rison quick answers
Recruiting profile
4-star recruit