Player Stats

Anthony McFarland Jr. College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
1,847
Rushing yards
1,648
Receiving yards
199
Touchdowns
13

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2018 Regular SeasonMaryland121,1071,03473469
2019 Regular SeasonMaryland11740614126961

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season

Maryland paired 1,107 primary output with 60.7 efficiency.

Supporting note

2019 Regular Season role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 48.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value cooled off

2019 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Michigan State

Loss with 138 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2019 Regular Season · Maryland

Games

11

Scrimmage Yards / G

67.3

Efficiency

48.9

Usage

24.5

Consistency

58.4

Best Game by takeover score

Michigan State

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Howard: 32. Syracuse: 120. Temple: 132. Penn State: 31. Rutgers: 90. Purdue: 22. Minnesota: 58. Michigan: 69. Ohio State: 10. Nebraska: 38. Michigan State: 138

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Howard: 7 by 37.8. Syracuse: 16 by 64.7. Temple: 26 by 52.9. Penn State: 12 by 27.4. Rutgers: 8 by 96.9. Purdue: 6 by 21.5. Minnesota: 13 by 42.3. Michigan: 15 by 46. Ohio State: 8 by 12.5. Nebraska: 11 by 36.3. Michigan State: 9 by 100

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins80.7 · Games = 3 · +18.4 vs Losses
Losses62.3 · Games = 8 · -18.4 vs Wins