Player Stats

Corey Bethley College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
92
TFL
19.5
Sacks
10.5
QB hurries
9
Passes defended
1

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2017 PostseasonTCU121-01-034
2017 Regular SeasonTCU1222314-034
2018 PostseasonTCU11211--059.9
2018 Regular SeasonTCU11238.5411059.9
2019 Regular SeasonTCU122042.51-028.6
2020 Regular SeasonTCU46211-041.2
2021 Regular SeasonTCU718111-022.9

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason

TCU paired 16.5 primary output with 24.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

2021 Regular Season role shape

impact-led usage with 15 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value cooled off

2021 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: West Virginia

Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2021 Regular Season · TCU

Games

7

Havoc Plays / G

0.4

Efficiency

15

Usage

5.9

Consistency

9.5

Best Game by takeover score

West Virginia

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. California: 1. Oklahoma: 0. West Virginia: 2. Baylor: 0. Oklahoma State: 0. Kansas: 0. Iowa State: 0

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. California: 1 by 14.2. Oklahoma: 1 by 4.2. West Virginia: 5 by 40.8. Baylor: 2 by 8.3. Oklahoma State: 2 by 8.3. Kansas: 6 by 25. Iowa State: 1 by 4.2

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins0.3 · Games = 3 · -0.2 vs Losses
Losses0.5 · Games = 4 · +0.2 vs Wins