Usage Score
8.9
Player Dossier
2017-2018Texas State
WR • 6'3" • 195 lbs • Convington, LA, USA
T.J. Bedford reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
8.9
Efficiency
66.7
Consistency
63.5
Season Value
59.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season · Texas State
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
T.J. Bedford, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season · Texas State. T.J. Bedford reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
T.J. Bedford played WR for Texas State. Across 2 tracked seasons, T.J. Bedford recorded 90 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2018 with Texas State.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season
Texas State paired 90 primary output with 66.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 66.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2018 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UTSA
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
5
Receiving Yards / G
18
Efficiency
66.7
Usage
8.9
Consistency
63.5
Best Game by takeover score
Georgia Southern
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 3. South Alabama: 22. UTSA: 39. Louisiana: 18. Georgia Southern: 8
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 1 by 20. South Alabama: 2 by 73.3. UTSA: 3 by 86.7. Louisiana: 1 by 100. Georgia Southern: 1 by 53.3
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
5 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
UTSA
Best efficiency game
100 vs Louisiana
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Texas State
2017-2018
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 Regular Season | Texas State | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2018 Regular Season | Texas State | 90 | 66.7 | 8.9 | 90 |
#1 Featured game
UTSA
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
39
Primary metric
39 receiving yards with a 86.7 efficiency score.
#2
Louisiana
18
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
18 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
South Alabama
22
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
22 receiving yards with a 73.3 efficiency score.
#4
Georgia Southern
8
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
8 receiving yards with a 53.3 efficiency score.
#5
Unknown
3
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
3 receiving yards with a 20 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2018 Regular Season · Texas State
90 primary output · 66.7 efficiency · 8.9 usage
59.5
#2
2017 Regular Season · Texas State
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2017 · Rating 0.7844
St Pauls School · Covington, LA
Career Facts
1
Career teams
2
Seasons tracked
90
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 2 tracked seasons, 5 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.