Player Stats

DeVonta Smith College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
3,965
Receptions
235
Touchdowns
49

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2017 PostseasonAlabama8245146.7
2017 Regular SeasonAlabama86115246.7
2018 PostseasonAlabama1312169158.8
2018 Regular SeasonAlabama1330524558.8
2019 PostseasonAlabama13356173.6
2019 Regular SeasonAlabama13651,2001373.6
2020 PostseasonAlabama1319345690.6
2020 Regular SeasonAlabama13981,5112090.6

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2020 Postseason

Alabama paired 1,856 primary output with 86.8 efficiency.

Supporting note

2020 Postseason role shape

target-driven usage with 86.8 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2020 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: LSU

Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2020 Postseason · Alabama

Games

13

Receiving Yards / G

142.8

Efficiency

86.8

Usage

36.5

Consistency

75.4

Best Game by takeover score

LSU

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Ohio State: 215. Notre Dame: 130. Missouri: 89. Texas A&M: 63. Ole Miss: 164. Georgia: 167. Tennessee: 73. Mississippi State: 203. Kentucky: 144. Auburn: 171. LSU: 231. Arkansas: 22. Florida: 184

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Ohio State: 12 by 100. Notre Dame: 7 by 100. Missouri: 8 by 74.2. Texas A&M: 6 by 70. Ole Miss: 13 by 84.1. Georgia: 11 by 100. Tennessee: 7 by 69.5. Mississippi State: 11 by 100. Kentucky: 9 by 100. Auburn: 7 by 100. LSU: 8 by 100. Arkansas: 3 by 48.9. Florida: 15 by 81.8

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

First Half128.7 · Games = 7 · -30.5 vs Second Half
Second Half159.2 · Games = 6 · +30.5 vs First Half