Usage Score
36.5
Player Dossier
2017-2020Alabama
DeVonta Smith
WR • 6'1" • 175 lbs • Amite, LA, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
DeVonta Smith reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
86.8
Consistency
75.4
Season Value
74.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2020 Postseason · Alabama
1717181819192020
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 8
- Program Path
- Alabama
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Ole Miss
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
DeVonta Smith, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2020 Postseason · Alabama. DeVonta Smith reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2020 Postseason
Alabama paired 1,856 primary output with 86.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2020 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 86.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2020 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: LSU
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2020 Postseason · Alabama
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
142.8
Efficiency
86.8
Usage
36.5
Consistency
75.4
Best Game by takeover score
Ohio State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Ohio State: 215. Notre Dame: 130. Missouri: 89. Texas A&M: 63. Ole Miss: 164. Georgia: 167. Tennessee: 73. Mississippi State: 203. Kentucky: 144. Auburn: 171. LSU: 231. Arkansas: 22. Florida: 184
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Ohio State: 12 by 100. Notre Dame: 7 by 100. Missouri: 8 by 74.2. Texas A&M: 6 by 70. Ole Miss: 13 by 84.1. Georgia: 11 by 100. Tennessee: 7 by 69.5. Mississippi State: 11 by 100. Kentucky: 9 by 100. Auburn: 7 by 100. LSU: 8 by 100. Arkansas: 3 by 48.9. Florida: 15 by 81.8
Split Comparison
Wins142.8 · n=13
First Half128.7 · n=7 · -30.5 vs Second Half
Second Half159.2 · n=6 · +30.5 vs First Half
All Games142.8 · n=13
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
LSU
Best efficiency game
100 vs Ohio State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue 1/12 | vs Ohio State100 receiving yards · High volume | W 52-24 | — | 12 | 215 | 17.9 | 17.90 | 3 | 44 |
| Fri 1/1 | vs Notre Dame100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | W 31-14 | — | 7 | 130 | 15.6 | 18.60 | 3 | 34 |
| Sun 12/20 | @ Florida100 receiving yards · High volume | W 52-46 | — | 15 | 184 | 12.3 | 12.30 | 2 | 31 |
| Sat 12/12 | @ Arkansas | W 52-3 | — | 3 | 22 | 7.3 | 7.30 | 0 | 10 |
| Sun 12/6 | @ LSU100 receiving yards · High volume | W 55-17 | — | 8 | 231 | 28.9 | 28.90 | 3 | 65 |
| Sat 11/28 | vs Auburn100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | W 42-13 | — | 7 | 171 | 22.5 | 24.40 | 2 | 66 |
| Sat 11/21 | vs Kentucky100 receiving yards · High volume | W 63-3 | — | 9 | 144 | 16 | 16 | 2 | 35 |
| Sat 10/31 | vs Mississippi State100 receiving yards · High volume | W 41-0 | — | 11 | 203 | 18.5 | 18.50 | 4 | 53 |
| Sat 10/24 | @ Tennessee | W 48-17 | — | 7 | 73 | 10.4 | 10.40 | 0 | 16 |
| Sun 10/18 | vs Georgia100 receiving yards · High volume | W 41-24 | — | 11 | 167 | 15.2 | 15.20 | 2 | 34 |
| Sat 10/10 | @ Ole Miss100 receiving yards · High volume | W 63-48 | — | 13 | 164 | 12.7 | 12.60 | 1 | 36 |
| Sat 10/3 | vs Texas A&M | W 52-24 | — | 6 | 63 | 10.5 | 10.50 | 1 | 20 |
| Sat 9/26 | @ MissouriHigh volume | W 38-19 | — | 8 | 89 | 8.6 | 11.10 | 0 | 23 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Alabama
2017-2020
Opening stop
Season Progression
20172017201820182019201920202020
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 Postseason | Alabama | 160 | 84.2 | 7.5 | — |
| 2017 Regular Season | Alabama | 160 | 84.2 | 7.5 | 0 |
| 2018 Postseason | Alabama | 693 | 81.5 | 16 | 533 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Alabama | 693 | 81.5 | 16 | 0 |
| 2019 Postseason | Alabama | 1,256 | 93.5 | 23.6 | 563 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Alabama | 1,256 | 93.5 | 23.6 | 0 |
| 2020 Postseason | Alabama | 1,856 | 86.8 | 36.5 | 600 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Alabama | 1,856 | 86.8 | 36.5 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Ole Miss
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
274
Primary metric
274 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
LSU
231
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
231 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Mississippi State
203
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
203 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Ohio State
215
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
215 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Oklahoma
104
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
104 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2020 Postseason · Alabama
1,856 primary output · 86.8 efficiency · 36.5 usage
74.7
#2
2020 Regular Season · Alabama
74.7
1,856 primary · 86.8 efficiency · 36.5 usage
#3
2019 Postseason · Alabama
63.3
1,256 primary · 93.5 efficiency · 23.6 usage
Milestones
14
100+ receiving yards
10
8+ catch outings
12
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2017 · Rating 0.9717
Amite · Amite, LA
- Committed To
- Alabama
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2017
Career Facts
1
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
3,965
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 47 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.