Usage Score
9.3
Player Dossier
2018-2021Alabama
Phidarian Mathis
DL • 6'4" • 312 lbs • Wisner, LA, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Phidarian Mathis shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 31.9 disruption score.
Efficiency
31.9
Consistency
57.4
Season Value
36.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2021 Postseason · Alabama
1818191920202121
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 8
- Program Path
- Alabama
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Cincinnati
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Phidarian Mathis, DL. Best season Best season by value score: 2021 Postseason · Alabama. Phidarian Mathis shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 31.9 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2021 Postseason
Alabama paired 22.5 primary output with 31.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2021 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 31.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2021 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Cincinnati
Win with 5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2021 Postseason · Alabama
Games
14
Havoc Plays / G
1.6
Efficiency
31.9
Usage
9.3
Consistency
57.4
Best Game by takeover score
Georgia
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011121314
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Georgia: 0. Cincinnati: 5. Miami: 2. Unknown: 2. Florida: 1. Southern Miss: 0. Ole Miss: 2. Texas A&M: 0. Mississippi State: 0. Tennessee: 2. LSU: 2.5. Arkansas: 1. Auburn: 3. Georgia: 2
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Georgia: 4 by 16.7. Cincinnati: 3 by 62.5. Miami: 5 by 40.8. Unknown: 3 by 32.5. Florida: 7 by 39.2. Southern Miss: 1 by 4.2. Ole Miss: 3 by 32.5. Texas A&M: 3 by 12.5. Mississippi State: 1 by 4.2. Tennessee: 4 by 36.7. LSU: 9 by 62.5. Arkansas: 5 by 30.8. Auburn: 3 by 42.5. Georgia: 2 by 28.3
Split Comparison
Wins1.9 · n=11 · +1.9 vs Losses
Losses0 · n=2 · -1.9 vs Wins
First Half1.7 · n=7 · +0.2 vs Second Half
Second Half1.5 · n=7 · -0.2 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
14 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Cincinnati
Best efficiency game
62.5 vs Cincinnati
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue 1/11 | vs Georgia | L 18-33 | 4 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 12/31 | vs CincinnatiSplash game | W 27-6 | 3 | 2 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Sat 12/4 | vs Georgia | W 41-24 | 2 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/27 | @ Auburn | W 24-22 | 3 | 2 | — | 1.50 | 1.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/20 | vs Arkansas | W 42-35 | 5 | 2 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/6 | vs LSU | W 20-14 | 9 | 2 | — | 1.50 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/23 | vs Tennessee | W 52-24 | 4 | 2 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/16 | @ Mississippi State | W 49-9 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 10/10 | @ Texas A&M | L 38-41 | 3 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/2 | vs Ole Miss | W 42-21 | 3 | 2 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/25 | vs Southern Miss | W 63-14 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/18 | @ Florida | W 31-29 | 7 | 1 | — | 0.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/11 | vs Unknown | — | 3 | 2 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/4 | @ Miami | W 44-13 | 5 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Alabama
2018-2021
Opening stop
Season Progression
20182018201920192020202020212021
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 Postseason | Alabama | 0 | 6.8 | 1.3 | — |
| 2018 Regular Season | Alabama | 0 | 6.8 | 1.3 | 0 |
| 2019 Postseason | Alabama | 0.5 | 10.7 | 2.1 | 0.5 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Alabama | 0.5 | 10.7 | 2.1 | 0 |
| 2020 Postseason | Alabama | 8.5 | 22.9 | 6.6 | 8 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Alabama | 8.5 | 22.9 | 6.6 | 0 |
| 2021 Postseason | Alabama | 22.5 | 31.9 | 9.3 | 14 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Alabama | 22.5 | 31.9 | 9.3 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Cincinnati
Win with 5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
5
Primary metric
5 disruption/tackle impact with 58.6 takeover score.
#2
Mississippi State
4
Primary metric
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 54.1 takeover score.
#3
LSU
2.5
Primary metric
Win with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2.5 disruption/tackle impact with 42.7 takeover score.
#4
Ole Miss
2.5
Primary metric
Win with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2.5 disruption/tackle impact with 38.2 takeover score.
#5
Auburn
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 37.4 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2021 Postseason · Alabama
22.5 primary output · 31.9 efficiency · 9.3 usage
36.6
#2
2021 Regular Season · Alabama
36.6
22.5 primary · 31.9 efficiency · 9.3 usage
#3
2018 Postseason · Alabama
36
0 primary · 6.8 efficiency · 1.3 usage
Milestones
0
Impact games
1
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2017 · Rating 0.9528
Neville · Monroe, LA
- Committed To
- Alabama
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2017
Career Facts
1
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
127
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 45 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.