Usage Score
26.7
Player Dossier
2017-2019Alabama
Jerry Jeudy
WR • 6'1" • 192 lbs • Deerfield Beach, FL, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Jerry Jeudy reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
86.5
Consistency
66
Season Value
69.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · Alabama
171718181919
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Alabama
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Michigan
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jerry Jeudy, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · Alabama. Jerry Jeudy reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason
Alabama paired 1,315 primary output with 90.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 86.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Michigan
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2019 Postseason · Alabama
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
89.5
Efficiency
86.5
Usage
26.7
Consistency
66
Best Game by takeover score
Michigan
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Michigan: 204. Duke: 137. New Mexico State: 103. South Carolina: 68. Southern Miss: 96. Ole Miss: 84. Texas A&M: 50. Tennessee: 41. Arkansas: 103. LSU: 71. Mississippi State: 114. Unknown: 66. Auburn: 26
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Michigan: 6 by 100. Duke: 10 by 91.3. New Mexico State: 8 by 85.8. South Carolina: 6 by 75.6. Southern Miss: 6 by 100. Ole Miss: 8 by 70. Texas A&M: 4 by 83.3. Tennessee: 3 by 91.1. Arkansas: 7 by 98.1. LSU: 5 by 94.7. Mississippi State: 7 by 100. Unknown: 2 by 100. Auburn: 5 by 34.7
Split Comparison
Wins100 · n=10 · +51.5 vs Losses
Losses48.5 · n=2 · -51.5 vs Wins
First Half106 · n=7 · +35.8 vs Second Half
Second Half70.2 · n=6 · -35.8 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Michigan
Best efficiency game
100 vs Michigan
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 1/1 | vs Michigan100 receiving yards | W 35-16 | — | 6 | 204 | 29.3 | 34 | 1 | 85 |
| Sat 11/30 | @ Auburn | L 45-48 | — | 5 | 26 | 5.2 | 5.20 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 11/23 | vs Unknown | — | — | 2 | 66 | 33 | 33 | 0 | 44 |
| Sat 11/16 | @ Mississippi State100 receiving yards | W 38-7 | — | 7 | 114 | 16.3 | 16.30 | 0 | 37 |
| Sat 11/9 | vs LSU | L 41-46 | — | 5 | 71 | 14.2 | 14.20 | 1 | 26 |
| Sat 10/26 | vs Arkansas100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | W 48-7 | — | 7 | 103 | 14.7 | 14.70 | 2 | 40 |
| Sun 10/20 | vs Tennessee | W 35-13 | — | 3 | 41 | 13.7 | 13.70 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 10/12 | @ Texas A&M | W 47-28 | — | 4 | 50 | 12.5 | 12.50 | 0 | 26 |
| Sat 9/28 | vs Ole MissHigh volume | W 59-31 | — | 8 | 84 | 10.5 | 10.50 | 0 | 25 |
| Sat 9/21 | vs Southern Miss2+ TD | W 49-7 | — | 6 | 96 | 16 | 16 | 2 | 36 |
| Sat 9/14 | @ South Carolina | W 47-23 | — | 6 | 68 | 11.3 | 11.30 | 0 | 30 |
| Sat 9/7 | vs New Mexico State100 receiving yards · High volume | W 62-10 | — | 8 | 103 | 12.9 | 12.90 | 3 | 23 |
| Sat 8/31 | vs Duke100 receiving yards · High volume | W 42-3 | — | 10 | 137 | 13.7 | 13.70 | 1 | 21 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Alabama
2017-2019
Opening stop
Season Progression
201720172018201820192019
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 Postseason | Alabama | 264 | 91.7 | 10.8 | — |
| 2017 Regular Season | Alabama | 264 | 91.7 | 10.8 | 0 |
| 2018 Postseason | Alabama | 1,315 | 90.5 | 22.4 | 1,051 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Alabama | 1,315 | 90.5 | 22.4 | 0 |
| 2019 Postseason | Alabama | 1,163 | 86.5 | 26.7 | -152 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Alabama | 1,163 | 86.5 | 26.7 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Michigan
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
204
Primary metric
204 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Arkansas
135
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
135 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Vanderbilt
68
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
68 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Clemson
139
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
139 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Missouri
147
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
147 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2018 Postseason · Alabama
1,315 primary output · 90.5 efficiency · 22.4 usage
71.6
#2
2018 Regular Season · Alabama
71.6
1,315 primary · 90.5 efficiency · 22.4 usage
#3
2019 Postseason · Alabama
69.8
1,163 primary · 86.5 efficiency · 26.7 usage
Milestones
10
100+ receiving yards
4
8+ catch outings
7
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
5★
Class 2017 · Rating 0.9881
Deerfield Beach · Pompano Beach, FL
- Committed To
- Alabama
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2017
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
2,742
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 36 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.