Usage Score
36.2
Player Dossier
2017-2020Alabama
Najee Harris
RB • 6'2" • 230 lbs • Antioch, CA, USA
Workhorse runnerSteady chain mover
Najee Harris leans workhorse runner traits and 62.9 efficiency.
Efficiency
62.9
Consistency
77.1
Season Value
69
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2020 Postseason · Alabama
1717181819192020
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 8
- Program Path
- Alabama
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: LSU
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Najee Harris, RB. Best season Best season by value score: 2020 Postseason · Alabama. Najee Harris leans workhorse runner traits and 62.9 efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2020 Postseason
Alabama paired 1,891 primary output with 62.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2020 Postseason role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 62.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2020 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Ole Miss
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2020 Postseason · Alabama
Games
13
Scrimmage Yards / G
145.5
Efficiency
62.9
Usage
36.2
Consistency
77.1
Best Game by takeover score
Ohio State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Ohio State: 158. Notre Dame: 155. Missouri: 106. Texas A&M: 69. Ole Miss: 248. Georgia: 162. Tennessee: 157. Mississippi State: 155. Kentucky: 110. Auburn: 130. LSU: 148. Arkansas: 48. Florida: 245
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Ohio State: 29 by 45.1. Notre Dame: 19 by 84. Missouri: 19 by 59.3. Texas A&M: 14 by 42.9. Ole Miss: 26 by 89.7. Georgia: 32 by 51.7. Tennessee: 26 by 55.2. Mississippi State: 27 by 59.3. Kentucky: 15 by 70.5. Auburn: 13 by 91.7. LSU: 23 by 70. Arkansas: 15 by 33.9. Florida: 36 by 64.2
Split Comparison
Wins145.5 · n=13
First Half150.7 · n=7 · +11.4 vs Second Half
Second Half139.3 · n=6 · -11.4 vs First Half
All Games145.5 · n=13
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Ole Miss
Best efficiency game
91.7 vs Auburn
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue 1/12 | vs Ohio State150 scrimmage yards · 2+ TD | W 52-24 | 22 | 79 | 3.60 | 2 | 7 | 79 | 5.4 |
| Fri 1/1 | vs Notre Dame100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 31-14 | 15 | 125 | 8.30 | 0 | 4 | 30 | 8.2 |
| Sun 12/20 | @ Florida100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 52-46 | 31 | 178 | 5.70 | 2 | 5 | 67 | 6.8 |
| Sat 12/12 | @ Arkansas2+ TD | W 52-3 | 14 | 46 | 3.30 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3.2 |
| Sun 12/6 | @ LSU100 rush yards · 2+ TD | W 55-17 | 21 | 145 | 6.90 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 6.4 |
| Sat 11/28 | vs Auburn | W 42-13 | 11 | 96 | 8.70 | 1 | 2 | 34 | 10 |
| Sat 11/21 | vs Kentucky2+ TD | W 63-3 | 13 | 83 | 6.40 | 2 | 2 | 27 | 7.3 |
| Sat 10/31 | vs Mississippi State100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 41-0 | 21 | 119 | 5.70 | 0 | 6 | 36 | 5.7 |
| Sat 10/24 | @ Tennessee150 scrimmage yards · 2+ TD | W 48-17 | 20 | 96 | 4.80 | 3 | 6 | 61 | 6.0 |
| Sun 10/18 | vs Georgia100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 41-24 | 31 | 152 | 4.90 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 5.1 |
| Sat 10/10 | @ Ole Miss100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 63-48 | 23 | 206 | 9 | 5 | 3 | 42 | 9.5 |
| Sat 10/3 | vs Texas A&M2+ TD | W 52-24 | 12 | 43 | 3.60 | 2 | 2 | 26 | 4.9 |
| Sat 9/26 | @ Missouri2+ TD | W 38-19 | 17 | 98 | 5.80 | 3 | 2 | 8 | 5.6 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Alabama
2017-2020
Opening stop
Season Progression
20172017201820182019201920202020
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 Postseason | Alabama | 415 | 61.4 | 10.7 | — |
| 2017 Regular Season | Alabama | 415 | 61.4 | 10.7 | 0 |
| 2018 Postseason | Alabama | 790 | 64.3 | 13.7 | 375 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Alabama | 790 | 64.3 | 13.7 | 0 |
| 2019 Postseason | Alabama | 1,528 | 64.3 | 33.4 | 738 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Alabama | 1,528 | 64.3 | 33.4 | 0 |
| 2020 Postseason | Alabama | 1,891 | 62.9 | 36.2 | 363 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Alabama | 1,891 | 62.9 | 36.2 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
LSU
Loss with 190 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
190
Primary metric
190 scrimmage yards and 44.9 usage.
#2
Ole Miss
248
Primary metric
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
248 scrimmage yards and 38.8 usage.
#3
Arkansas State
135
Primary metric
Win with 135 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
135 scrimmage yards and 20.3 usage.
#4
Florida
245
Primary metric
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
245 scrimmage yards and 49.3 usage.
#5
Auburn
172
Primary metric
Loss driven by a workhorse rushing load.
172 scrimmage yards and 48.4 usage.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2020 Postseason · Alabama
1,891 primary output · 62.9 efficiency · 36.2 usage
69
#2
2020 Regular Season · Alabama
69
1,891 primary · 62.9 efficiency · 36.2 usage
#3
2019 Postseason · Alabama
67.1
1,528 primary · 64.3 efficiency · 33.4 usage
Milestones
20
100+ rush yards
10
150+ scrimmage yards
16
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
5★
Class 2017 · Rating 0.9984
Antioch · Antioch, CA
- Committed To
- Alabama
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2017
Career Facts
1
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
4,624
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 51 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.