Player Stats

Brendon Evers College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
45
TFL
7.5
Sacks
4
QB hurries
7
Passes defended
3

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2018 PostseasonOklahoma State70-01-017.8
2018 Regular SeasonOklahoma State7711--017.8
2019 Regular SeasonOklahoma State56-012029.2
2020 Regular SeasonOklahoma State88-02-011.7
2021 PostseasonOklahoma State121-0--044.8
2021 Regular SeasonOklahoma State12206311044.8
2022 Regular SeasonOklahoma State430.502-029.4

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2021 Postseason

Oklahoma State paired 11 primary output with 16.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

2022 Regular Season role shape

impact-led usage with 9.4 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value cooled off

2022 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Arizona State

Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2022 Regular Season · Oklahoma State

Games

4

Havoc Plays / G

0.6

Efficiency

9.4

Usage

1.9

Consistency

69.6

Best Game by takeover score

Arizona State

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Central Michigan: 0.5. Arizona State: 1. Baylor: 0. Texas Tech: 1

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Central Michigan: 2 by 13.3. Arizona State: 0 by 10. Baylor: 1 by 4.2. Texas Tech: 0 by 10

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

First Half0.8 · Games = 2 · +0.3 vs Second Half
Second Half0.5 · Games = 2 · -0.3 vs First Half